The long-standing debate over the transfer of wartime operational control (OPCON) is once again emerging as a contentious issue in the ROK-U.S. alliance. The Lee Jae Myung administration has repeatedly expressed its determination to accelerate the transfer, while the Trump administration remains reluctant, emphasizing the need to meet the agreed conditions. The fact that the Security Consultative Meeting (SCM), at which the two sides were expected to discuss and finalize a roadmap for the transfer, has been postponed until next year suggests that their differences remain unresolved. There is a real possibility that the OPCON issue could become a source of friction in the alliance. The sensitivity and importance of this issue stem from its direct connection to two fundamental values: sovereignty and security. From the perspective of national sovereignty, the commander-in-chief should be able to exercise full command authority over the country's own armed forces. President Lee has also stressed that South Korea cannot continue to leave its military sovereignty in the hands of another co
N. Korea set for solo UNESCO taekwondo listing as S. Korea misses joint bid
Polls begin to close in midterm elections as voters pass judgment on Trump's second term
Lee questions multicultural benefits: Centrist outreach or political misstep?
N. Korea says dialogue with US option but not must for national interest
Viral 'text hip' trend boosts bookstore sales, brings literature to food aisles
Brunello Cucinelli founder under fire for 'inappropriate touching' of Chinese actress after Kim You-jung controversy
Binance hackers used fake job interview in $6.3 bil. attack
AI-built virtual Buddhist temple draws 1 mil. visitors in less than a week
InterviewWhy more K-food brands need 'OU' for global markets
Beyond sovereignty: Why OPCON transfer matters for South Korea's security
Taboola 후원링크