Korean names and the slave question
By Mark PetersonI am going to return to a familiar story for me, the remarkable story of Korean family names. I am returning to this issue because I still get questions and comments based on popular misinformation and mistaken ideas that still circulate in Korea.The mistaken ideas: (1) that traditionally, only yangban aristocrats had surnames ― and that commoners and slaves didn't acquire surnames until the 20th century; (2) that the high frequency of the names Kim, Yi and Bak are because of all the slaves who took names and merely copied the most common surnames ― Kim, Yi and Bak, and (3) that slaves numbered between 90 percent or at least 50 percent of the population.Let's take these three items in reverse order. The estimates of slaves at 90 percent is ridiculous and even 50 percent is a great exaggeration. At the outset of the Joseon Kingdom slave-holdings may have been as high as 40 percent, but that number declined gradually over time, especially when Korea reached the period of increased commercial activity of the 18th and 19th centuries. At the point in the early 20th century
