Treaties don't guarantee peace
By Andrew SalmonOne hundred years ago this Sunday ― at 11 o'clock, on Nov. 11, 1918 ― the guns fell silent across Europe. An armistice had been signed, ending World War I. In the title of Remarque's famous novel there was “All Quiet on the Western Front.”Much of Europe was devastated. Millions had died, both in combat and of starvation. Vast swathes of land were churned into mile upon mile of cratered, poisoned mud. These apocalyptic “deathscapes” have been captured in art, photography and poetry. Such had been the extent of the destruction and carnage that many believed World War I was “The war to end all wars.” Of course, it was not. Armistices in the east in 1917, and in the west in 1918, were followed by peace treaties: At Brest Litovsk, in 1918, and in Versailles in 1919. Despite these armistices and treaties, war would return to Europe in 1939. This was because the core issue ― notably the place and role of a powerful and ambitious Germany in Europe ― had not been adequately addressed by the treaties. Moreover, a hideous and lethal new elemen