Tax Theft

Prosecution Needs to Sternly Deal With Bribery Case

The prosecution plans to summon Jeon Goon-pyo, commissioner of the National Tax Administration, next week for questioning over the allegation that he received a bribe from a subordinate. The former head of the Busan Regional Tax Office Chung Sang-gon has claimed he gave Jeon 60 million won of the 100 million won he had received from a corrupt builder.

Chung's testimony appears persuasive as he was specific about the money ― 50 million won in Korean won and 10 million won in U.S. dollars ― which was handed over to Jeon on several occasions. Chung told the prosecution he gave the money when Jeon was about to make overseas trips with the excuse of assisting his travel. The prosecution has yet to secure compelling evidence to prove Jeon's guilt besides Chung's testimony.

Should Chung's statements be found to be true, the case will bring about a whirlpool impact upon society. It will deal a fatal blow to President Roh Moo-hyun and his participatory government as he has put first priority on keeping clean hands. Roh's administration has already been tainted with its much-touted morality with Chung Yoon-jae, former presidential protocol secretary, found to have mediated shady construction dealings between Chung Sang-gon and Kim Sang-jin, a constructor in Busan.

Jeon has thus far denied allegation that he received money from Chung. But he triggered suspicion by asking the prosecution to refrain from exploring where Chung spent the 100 million won he received. The prosecution has refused to elaborate on the case despite a flurry of questions from lawmakers during a National Assembly inspection of state affairs. "As the case is now under investigation, we cannot comment,'' it said. The prosecution's attitude is not usual. If it had confirmed Jeon's innocence, it might have come up with a different answer.

We urge the prosecution to strictly deal with the matter by fully exercising its given investigative rights. The issue is a very serious one closely related to the current government's fate. So far the prosecution has maintained a very cautious attitude. But what is more important is to get the real picture of the case regardless of the political implications. The prosecution has previously been the target of criticism for its political inclination especially in addressing sensitive pending issues. Now it faces a precious chance to cast off this dishonorable image. And further it is its stern duty bestowed by the people for the realization of justice.