Watchdog or lapdog? - The Korea Times

Watchdog or lapdog?

When Tongyang Group committed a series of managerial mistakes and wrongdoings in 2012, few of its outside directors tried to

oust

its chairman, Hyun Jae-hyun. Most of them helped to keep the problems secret or lobbied to defend Korea’s 38th-largest

conglomerate

and its owner. Had they fulfilled their duty to follow proper checks and balances, some 50,000 individuals might not have seen their investments go up in smoke.

Tongyang is not an exception but the norm. Which shows how mistaken external directors here are to perceive their role as passive helpers or providers of rubber stamps for management, instead of watching and

rectify

ing bad moves made by the latter.

As the main role of outside directors is to lobby for family-run conglomerates, tycoons choose theirs from among former bureaucrats and politicians, who serve as “protection” from the whirlwind of government reforms.

There is little surprise then that four in every 10 outside directors to be appointed by the nation’s 10 largest chaebol this month are former policymakers, election campaigners, taxmen, trustbusters and politicized professors. According to Chaebul.com, an online market research firm, such business-politics-bureaucracy

collusion

has even

thrive

d, not declined, in recent years under this nation’s regressive corporate governance.

The degradation of the outside director system is all the more lamentable, when considering that the nation introduced it in 1998 in the aftermath of the Asian financial crisis to check wayward chaebol and its top managers. It is a sad reminder of a proven truth that a system, however good its seeds are, cannot take root and bear fruit if the soil beneath its foundations is poor and corrupt.

It is long past time for Korea to revolutionize that chummy boardroom culture, if for no other reason than to prevent a repeat of the economic crisis.

The nation needs to learn from the examples of advanced countries, which appoint outside directors even from among former executives of rival companies, and those recommended by small shareholders in and outside of the companies. Or the business owners can pick directors among multiple candidates recommended by an independent body.

The government should also revise rules to force these corporate watchdogs to report their decisions and activities, and be held accountable for neglect of duty or misjudgment.

President Park Geun-hye, who pledged to reform the outside director system during campaigns, ought to take action by setting up a blue-ribbon panel under her direct control. The proposed group should overhaul the distorted system, ranging from the perception of the role of outside directors to their selection process and boardroom operations.

Park will even be able to restore her badly damaged reputation caused by breaking campaign promises to pursue chaebol reform and “economic democratization” by reforming the outside director system.

There is a prerequisite for Park to tackle this task, however: She should stop appointing her former campaign workers and other cronies as outside directors of state enterprises and public corporations. Nothing could be more contradictory than calling for reform of public companies then filling their boardrooms with unqualified allies.

This is The Korea Times editorial for Tuesday, March 11, 2014.

※ 다음에 나오는 문제들은 본 기사에 나오는 중요한 어휘들로 구성된 토익, 토플, 텝스 기출 및 예상 문제입니다.

※ Choose the one word or phrase that best keeps the meaning of the highlighted part with a suitable one.

1. The company was bought in 1978 by the national

Chesebrough Ponds.

① international monopoly

② large corporation

③ takeover group

④ small concern

2. The

revised

proposal was debated.

① distasteful

② rejected

③ reviewed

④ amended

3. It was evident that to establish order they had to

depose

the king.

① dethrone

② thaw

③ melt

④ cope

4.The lawyer was falsely accused of

with his client.

① armament

② truce

③ conspiracy

④ contract

5. Some writers

on criticism.

① decline

② prosper

③ worry

④ ignore

[해설 및 정답]

1. [번역] 그 회사는 1978년 전국적 (규모의)

거대기업

이었던 Chesebrough Ponds에 매각되었다.

[어휘] conglomerate 덩어리, 집성체, 집합(체)(mass, cluster, assortment); 복합기업(체), (거)대기업(large corporation); (한국의) 재벌(chaebol)

① 국제적 독점(기업) ③ (기업에 대한) 적대적 인수(매수) 그룹 ④ 소규모 회사(콘체른)

[정답] ②

2. [번역]

수정된

그 제안이 논의되었다.

[어휘] revise 개정, 수정, 교정하다(amend, modify, revamp, rectify, change, alter, correct)

[정답] ④

3. [번역] 질서를 확립하기 위해서 그들은 왕을

폐위시켜야

했던 것이 명백했다.

[어휘] depose 면직시키다(put out of office, oust); (국왕을) 퇴위시키다(dethrone)

① 폐위(면직)시키다 ② 녹이다(녹다)(=③ melt) ④ cope with 대처하다

[정답] ①

4. [번역] 변호사는 그의 의뢰인과

결탁(공모)

했다는 억울한 죄를 입었다.

[정답] ③

5. [번역] 어떤 작가들은 비평(또는 평론)으로

성공하고

있다.

[어휘] prosper 번창, 번영하다(flourish, thrive), 성공하다(succeed)

Ahn Seong-jin

Ahn Seong-jin is a project manager in the Business Planning Team. He joined The Korea Times in late 2009 as a specialist in English Newspapers in Education (ENIE). He has a strong interest in fostering strategic partnerships with public and private sectors worldwide.

Interesting contents

Taboola 후원링크

Recommended Contents For You

Taboola 후원링크