State of terrorism
By Donald KirkWASHINGTON ― Here’s a question people here keep asking: Is North Korea a terrorist state? Forget about the missile shots. They’ve all landed in the sea and harmed no one. What about the nuclear tests? They dislocated some rocks deep underground but were otherwise harmless. So what does it take to persuade the U.S. State Department to list North Korea, again, as a “state sponsor of terrorism”?That’s been the topic of heated debate ever since the State Department, on orders of President George W. Bush, dropped North Korea from its list of terrorist nations in 2008. That was at the urging of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who’d been listening to U.S. negotiator, Christopher Hill, talking up the deals he’d made.How could North Korea be considered a “terrorist” state, goes the logic, after agreeing to a complicated schedule for gradually giving up its nukes in return for vast quantities of aid? Of course, North Korea did not begin to abide by any such deal while expanding its nuclear program, including the ability t
