Court rulings over conscientious objections differ
By Kim Se-jeong Courts are making different decisions on conscientious objectors, reflecting mixed public opinion about people who refuse mandatory military service due to religious or other reasons. The Supreme Court upheld an appeals court’s guilty verdict against a Jehovah’s Witness, surnamed Ahn, Thursday, who was sentenced to 18 months’ jail for refusing to serve in the military.All men in Korea are required to serve in the military, and those who resist can face a jail term of up to three years. Most conscientious objectors here are Jehovah’s Witnesses, who are against bearing firearms.The top court said the Constitutional Court had ruled that punishing those who refuse military service was not against the Constitution. “Also, conscientious objectors cannot be an exception to the law on military service,” it added.It said international human rights bodies have recommended Korea accept conscientious objections, but such a recommendation is not legally binding.This was the second time the highest court has ruled against conscientious
