 |
| A family member and an attorney representing South Korean victims of forced wartime labor by Japan speak during a press conference in front of the Seoul Central District Court in southern Seoul, Monday, after the court dismissed their damages suit against Japanese companies. The 85 forced labor victims and their families filed the suit against 16 Japanese companies in 2015, but the court rejected it, saying individual legal rights cannot be exercised under the 1965 treaty between Seoul and Tokyo on resolving colonial-era issues. The plaintiffs said they would appeal. Yonhap |
A local court on Monday dismissed a damages suit launched by 85 South Korean victims of wartime forced labor in Japan and their families against 16 Japanese companies, saying the plaintiffs don't have litigation rights.
The Seoul Central District Court said South Korean wartime forced laborers cannot claim individual legal rights to damages from Japan, while deciding to reject their collective suit.
The 85 forced labor victims and their families started their damages suit against 16 Japanese companies, including Nippon Steel Sumitomo Metal, Nissan Chemical and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2015.
This case is the largest among many similar lawsuits filed by South Korean victims of wartime forced labor in Japan. At first, 17 Japanese firms were sued but the plaintiffs dropped their suit against one of them.
Dismissal is a decision made without any trial due to the absence of litigation requirements. It can be viewed as tantamount to a ruling against the plaintiffs.
Referring to the 1965 agreement between Seoul and Tokyo on resolving colonial-era issues, the court said, "It cannot be said that individual claims are terminated or waived due to the Korea-Japan treaty. But it was decided that the individual rights cannot be exercised through lawsuits."
Japan has claimed that all colonial-era issues, including individual compensation, were resolved with the 1965 treaty.
The court said forced labor victims' individual compensation rights are covered by the Korea-Japan treaty considering treaty-related documents, the circumstances leading to the treaty, purported intentions of the concerned parties, and their follow-up measures.
"An acceptance of the plaintiffs' claim in this case may result in a violation of international law, including Article 27 of the Vienna Convention," the court said, adding that nonobservance of treaties cannot be justified by an invocation of internal laws that recognize the illegality of colonial rule.
The latest court ruling is in sharp contrast to an October 2018 ruling from the Supreme Court, which upheld an appeals court ruling in 2013 that ordered Nippon Steel to pay each of four Korean plaintiffs 100 million won ($87,720) in compensation for their wartime forced labor and unpaid work.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs criticized the district court ruling as "very unfair" and vowed to appeal.
"Today's ruling runs directly counter to a previous Supreme Court ruling on a similar case and is very unfair," Kang Gil, a lawyer, said.
Lim Cheol-ho, an 85-year-old plaintiff whose father was allegedly conscripted to work in Japan, condemned the court ruling as "pathetic."
"Is the judge a Korean national? Is it a Korean court? The ruling is deplorable and I can hardly open my mouth to speak on it," Lim said.
According to government data, more than 1 million Koreans were conscripted to work for Japanese companies and its military during World War II. Korea was under Japan's brutal colonial rule from 1910-45.
The damages suit was filed in May 2015, but the first hearing was held six years later last month due to delayed delivery of court documents and other problems.
Japanese companies did not take any action at first but appointed a Korean lawyer as their representative after the court decided on the public notice of the litigation.
The court had originally planned to hold the sentencing hearing on Thursday but suddenly decided to advance the schedule. (Yonhap)
![[INTERVIEW] Mirinae Lee's '8 Lives of a Century-Old Trickster' offers fresh perspective on Korean history](https://img.koreatimes.co.kr/upload/thumbnailV2/5fb62072584d44649ed0ca5956d387ea.jpg/dims/resize/178/optimize)
![[REVIEW] Preview gala sets stage for grand premiere of 'La Rose de Versailles' musical](https://img.koreatimes.co.kr/upload/thumbnailV2/c7528d2924cd43c8a469cd46e6f56127.jpg/dims/resize/178/optimize)
