The Korea Times close
National
  • Politics
  • Diplomacy
  • Defense
  • Labor & Environment
  • Law & Crime
  • Health & Welfare
  • Embassy
  • Seoul & Provinces
  • Education
  • Foreign Communities
  • Obituaries
  • Multicultural Youth Award
Biz & Tech
  • Auto
  • IT
  • Game
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail & Food
  • Energy
  • Construction
  • Airlines
Finance
  • Policies
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Banks
  • Non-banks
  • Economic Essay Contest
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to the Editor
Lifestyle
  • Arts
  • Books
  • Travel & Cuisine
  • Trend
  • Fashion
  • Around Town
  • Fortune Telling
Entertainment
  • K-pop
  • K-dramas & Shows
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Performances
  • Asia Model Festival
Sports
  • Football
  • Golf
  • Baseball
  • Other Sports
World
  • Asia Pacific
  • Americas
  • Europe & Africa
  • SCMP
Video
  • On the Spot
  • Feature
  • News
Photos
  • Photo News
  • Darkroom
Community
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to the Editor
Thu, January 28, 2021 | 18:30
Tribune Service
Supreme Court in danger
Posted : 2020-06-25 17:16
Updated : 2020-06-25 17:16
Mail
Print Preview
Font Size Up
Font Size Down
By Jay Ambrose

So now, the Supreme Court is in charge of the nation. It has scuttled the separation of powers while taking over the prerogatives of Congress and the executive branch.

We have an oligarchy unaccountable to the rule of law while answering instead to confused ideologies, the mood of the moment, political snarling, assumed moral superiority and whims dispensing with credible analysis.

As exemplified in two recent decisions, it is scary, truly scary, something that has shown its ugly face off and on for decades and yet seemed to have been cured with two excellent constitutionalists appointed as justices under President Donald Trump.

The threat has nevertheless risen again in two decisions, one contending the Civil Rights Act of 1964 said what it did not say and another saying that President Barack Obama's order called the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, though illegal, should be granted legal standing.

Concerning the Civil Rights Act, it forbade employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion and sex And the court decision said that, since it applies to sex, it also applies to sexual orientation and gender identity. Nope.

As a Wall Street Journal editorial wrote, Neil Gorsuch, who wrote the decision, had himself previously written that words in laws should be taken to mean what the ordinary, common meaning was at the time the law was written. And, when the act was written, the word "sex" referred to biological sex, to men and women as determined by their physicality.

A New York Times editorial calls this ruling "an emphatic win for civil rights, equal justice and common sense," which is to say, it has an uncommon notion of what constitutes common sense.

Yes, we should all want respect under the law for transgender and gay Americans so often maligned and treated unfairly, but that's the job of Congress and a president's pen. It is not the job of the Supreme Court unless you want separation of powers thrown away so that justices and editorial writers can think of themselves as moral heroes.

Yes, Congress should come to the rescue of gay and transgender people as well as to the rescue of children brought here illegally by their immigrant parents.

But the answer to this was not for the court to also abandon its responsibilities on the issue of people brought here illegally as children. Interestingly, it agreed that DACA was against the law but said the Trump executive order doing away with it was not well-enough written. That was beside the point. Illegal is illegal. The court now stands for illegality by way of an oligarchy yawning at what the law explicitly says?

Just as he joined Gorsuch and the court's four illiberal liberals on the civil rights decision, Justice John Roberts ― supposedly himself a constitutionalist ― joined the four illiberal liberals on the DACA decision.

It was thought that, thanks to Trump, we had five constitutionalists vs. four people who think the Constitution is a worn-out old document that should be amended by them instead of by a process intentionally arduous for protection of the public, still assuming they have some rights.

But no, and this is not just an interpretation but the assumption of certain vaporous ideals prone to their own liking. It is the court coalescing governmental power ultimately unto itself.

There is something for the court to fear, namely that the Democrats could win the Senate, House and presidency this year and push ahead with the plans of some to pack the court as a far more flagrant violation of principles.

Or maybe, with constitutionalists converting to puzzling ways of thinking, the Democrats will leave it alone, not so unhappy with what it has and simply replacing retirees with ideological puppets further degrading what we are.


Jay Ambrose (speaktojay@aol.com) is an op-ed columnist for Tribune News Service. His commentary was distributed by Tribune Content Agency.












 
WooriBank
 
  • SsangYong faces receivership as Mahindra-HAAH deal collapses
  • 3 separate COVID-19 tests required for international students coming to Korea
  • Are Kakao boss' children being prepared for future succession?
  • COVID-19 survivors suffering from aftereffects
  • Ultra-dovish Fed gives room to Bank of Korea
  • Questions rise over timing of Moon-Xi phone conversation
  • Budget airline industry faces major changes with new players, merger
  • S&P highlights Hyundai, Samsung, LG, SK betting on futuristic cars
  • AmorePacific aims for rebound through collaboration with Off-White
  • Childbirths hit record low in November; deaths rise to highest in 37 years
  • Actress and model Song Yu-jung dies at 26 Actress and model Song Yu-jung dies at 26
  • More K-pop singers contribute to animation soundtracks More K-pop singers contribute to animation soundtracks
  • K-pop groups prepare for returns after members finish mandatory military service K-pop groups prepare for returns after members finish mandatory military service
  • TXT's first Japanese album 'STILL DREAMING' dominates Oricon Chart TXT's first Japanese album 'STILL DREAMING' dominates Oricon Chart
  • AFI Awards: 'Minari' among the Best Films of 2020 AFI Awards: 'Minari' among the Best Films of 2020
DARKROOM
  • Biden takes office as 46th president

    Biden takes office as 46th president

  • Biden-Harris inauguration is taking shape

    Biden-Harris inauguration is taking shape

  • Second Trump impeachment

    Second Trump impeachment

  • Pro-Trump rioters breach the US Capitol

    Pro-Trump rioters breach the US Capitol

  • Our children deserve better (Part 2)

    Our children deserve better (Part 2)

WooriBank
  • About Korea Times
  • CEO Message
  • Times History
  • Content Sales
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Service
  • Mobile Service
  • RSS Service
  • 고충처리인
  • hankookilbo
  • Dongwha Group
  • Code of Ethics
Copyright