The Korea Times close
National
  • Politics
  • Diplomacy
  • Defense
  • Labor & Environment
  • Law & Crime
  • Health & Welfare
  • Embassy
  • Seoul & Provinces
  • Education
  • Foreign Communities
  • Obituaries
  • Multicultural Youth Award
Biz & Tech
  • Auto
  • IT
  • Game
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail & Food
  • Energy
  • Construction
  • Airlines
Finance
  • Policies
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Banks
  • Non-banks
  • Economic Essay Contest
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to the Editor
Lifestyle
  • Arts
  • Books
  • Travel & Cuisine
  • Trend
  • Fashion
  • Around Town
  • Fortune Telling
Entertainment
  • K-pop
  • K-dramas & Shows
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Performances
  • Asia Model Festival
Sports
  • Football
  • Golf
  • Baseball
  • Other Sports
World
  • Asia Pacific
  • Americas
  • Europe & Africa
  • SCMP
Video
  • On the Spot
  • Feature
  • News
Photos
  • Photo News
  • Darkroom
Community
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
Opinion
  • Park Moo-jong
  • Choi Sung-jin
  • Mark Peterson
  • Troy Stangarone
  • Tong Kim
  • Lee Seong-hyon
  • John Burton
  • Jason Lim
  • Donald Kirk
  • Kim Ji-myung
  • Hyon O'Brien
  • Deauwand Myers
  • Bernard Rowan
  • Casey Lartigue, Jr.
  • Stephen Costello
  • Semoon Chang
Tue, January 26, 2021 | 12:00
Tong Kim
Inconsistent foreign policy
Posted : 2015-08-02 17:33
Updated : 2015-08-02 17:43
Mail
Print Preview
Font Size Up
Font Size Down
By Tong Kim

Under a presidential system, democratic states can enter treaties or agreements with sovereign foreign states on important security issues, normally with the consent of their legislatures. However, the implementation of an agreement by an incumbent administration is not necessarily guaranteed by its succeeding administration.

In the case of the United States, the president has constitutional power to make treaties with foreign states, but only ''by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, provided two-thirds of the senators present concur."

The requirement of a two-thirds vote also applies to most serious issues, like overriding a presidential veto, amending the Constitution and judging on an impeached president of the United States.

During a series of hearings on the recent Iranian deal by the appropriate committees of both houses of Congress, a few lawmakers who oppose the deal asked why the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) should be treated as a treaty that would require the tougher bar of a two-thirds vote, despite the fact that Congress had agreed to review and vote on the JCPOA not as a treaty.

Secretary of State John Kerry's response was succinctly pragmatic: ''The Senate does not pass treaties." Besides, the United States does not have a normal diplomatic relationship with Iran.

The Senate rejected the 1919 Treaty of Versailles on the League of Nations. Recently, it has not yet ratified the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, which Washington invokes to reign in China' s territorial claims in the South China Sea; or the International Criminal Court, to which a U.N. Human Rights Committee, with U.S. support, was going to bring the case of North Korean human rights abuses.

The reason that the executive branch calls the Iranian deal the JCPOA or its 1994 nuclear agreement with North Korea ''the Agreed Framework" is obvious ― to avoid the semblance of a treaty subject to congressional scrutiny and approval.

This explains why the DPRK's demand for a ''peace treaty" instead of a ''peace agreement" would not be pragmatic. While the Iranian deal, in addition to the recent normalization of relations with Cuba, is an example of U.S. willingness to make a deal with countries which it has had a long hostile relationship, the Obama administration has made it clear that it will not move on the North Korean nuclear issue.

Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, commenting on the impact of the Iranian deal on North Korea on July 16, said, ''Every one of these situations are sui generis," with their own characteristics and history. If the deal is implemented in good faith, she said, that might give North Korea second thoughts about its dangerous path.

Neither the 1994 Agreement Framework nor the September 19 Joint Statement of the Six-Party Talks was formally approved by the U.S. Congress or accepted as international law by the proper procedures of the United Nations.

North Korea and the rest of the world learned an expensive lesson when the George W. Bush administration botched the Agreed Framework, which Pyongyang signed with the Clinton administration. Pyongyang also learned that even inter-Korean agreements, including summit declarations, were thrown away after changes of government in the South.

Republican members of the U.S. Congress are determined to kill the JCPOA, which was agreed upon by the P5+1 and Iran and endorsed by a recent U.N. Security Council resolution. They are running political ads to enlist public support to oppose it. If they fail to stop the deal, they may even go as far as abandoning during the next Republican administration.

Since the United States is still the sole superpower, whose leadership is looked up to by many countries around the globe, a U.S. failure to keep its commitment to a major international agreement like the JCPOA would be a grievous setback for the maintenance of international order. If the deal is rejected by Congress or by the next president, who would seriously negotiate anything with the United States?

The Iranian deal is a matter of war and peace. The administration argues it is a good deal to stop Iran from developing a nuclear bomb and if Iran breaches the agreement, the U.S. will have the same options that it has today, including sanctions and a military strike, which the opponents think would be better.

A military strike can destroy Iran's known nuclear facilities ― but only to slow down its nuclear ambition ― it will not end it permanently. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter told the Senate Armed Services Committee on July 29 that a military strike would prompt a response from Iran, which would be more destabilizing to the Gulf region.

By now, all the points in favor of or against the passage of the Iranian deal are out. Criticism includes the areas of Iran's malign activity ― including supporting terrorism against Americans and their allies in the region, especially Israel. Although there is no division between the proponents and opponents of the deal in their support for the security of Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's disagreement serves as an influential element in American politics.

U.S. specialists in Pyongyang are also watching very closely the unfolding of the new international drama surrounding the Iranian deal. If it is rejected by Congress, despite hard lobbying by the president toward as many lawmakers as possible, or if it is turned down by a future American president, it will guarantee that North Korea will not have '' authentic and credible" talks with Washington. What's your take?

Tong Kim is a Washington correspondent and columnist for The Korea Times. He is also a fellow at the Institute of ­ Korean-American Studies.










 
WooriBank
 
  • Police demand $100,000 from parents for daycare CCTV access
  • Salaried foreign workers should file year-end tax settlements by February
  • Court allows imports of life-size sex dolls
  • SK, Geely to form ties on hydrogen business
  • New virus cases over 400 again on large-scale cluster infection
  • Households' food expenses surge amid pandemic
  • ROK, US should reinforce alliance and partnership
  • Commercial banks call profit-sharing 'unfair'
  • COVID-19 transmission from human to animal prompt concerns
  • Korea aims to vaccinate 70% of population by September
  • Rapper Iron found dead Rapper Iron found dead
  • Hyun Bin thanks Son Ye-jin after winning grand prize at 2020 APAN Star Awards Hyun Bin thanks Son Ye-jin after winning grand prize at 2020 APAN Star Awards
  • Is Konglish dealing blow to K-pop's reputation? Is Konglish dealing blow to K-pop's reputation?
  • K-pop female artists heat up competition in chart race with comebacks this month K-pop female artists heat up competition in chart race with comebacks this month
  • EXO's D.O. discharged from military service EXO's D.O. discharged from military service
DARKROOM
  • Biden takes office as 46th president

    Biden takes office as 46th president

  • Biden-Harris inauguration is taking shape

    Biden-Harris inauguration is taking shape

  • Second Trump impeachment

    Second Trump impeachment

  • Pro-Trump rioters breach the US Capitol

    Pro-Trump rioters breach the US Capitol

  • Our children deserve better (Part 2)

    Our children deserve better (Part 2)

WooriBank
  • About Korea Times
  • CEO Message
  • Times History
  • Content Sales
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Service
  • Mobile Service
  • RSS Service
  • Ombudsman
  • hankookilbo
  • Dongwha Group
  • Code of Ethics
Copyright