President Park and the beast of public sentiment

By Michael Breen

The peaceful and good-natured behavior of the crowds which have gathered these past few Saturdays in Seoul to demand the resignation of President Park Geun-hye is a welcome departure from the usual style of anti-government protest in Korea.

For so long now, demonstrations have degenerated into attacks on police by hardcore protesters whose passion for the cause made them feel justified in using violence, albeit nonlethal, for political ends. But as most people want sensible debate not metal pipes and water cannons, poor tactics have ensured that for a long time now legitimate grievances have remained minority causes.

That the anti-Park Geun-hye demos are different is a sign of supreme popular confidence.

The explanation is well understood by Koreans but may be rather difficult for expatriates and visitors to grasp.

Here, when popular emotion over an issue reaches a certain critical mass it morphs into a beast that is so powerful that it steps up and overwhelms decision-making on a grand scale.

We call the beast "public sentiment," but neither this English translation nor the Korean words really convey what it is. That is because the more accurate naming — the people, the masses, the mob — implies something negative in our individualistic world and fails to convey that the beast is viewed as morally good.

The beast has credentials. In 1987, it rose up and forced the dictator to do away with the American-style electoral college system (that he controlled) to allow his successor to be chosen by direct popular vote.

One night during the three weeks of protests at that time, I think I saw it take human form.

This apparition appeared at the entrance of the Roman Catholic Cathedral in the Myeongdong district of Seoul, which was HQ for the democracy protesters. A young man in jeans with a bandana covering his mouth and nose like a cowboy was taunting the rows of riot police facing him across the lane. He was standing alone on a raised piece of ground in front of a wall protected only by the cathedral railings which were about waist-high.

To my amazement, the riot police leveled their rifles and started firing tear gas canisters directly at him. This was a clear and very dangerous violation of the rules of engagement.

Incredibly, he was not hit. As the canisters bounced off the railings in front of him and the wall behind him, enveloping him in a cloud of tear gas, he punched both fists into the air and screamed in fearless rage, "Change the Constitution!" Then, somehow, he was gone.

But the beast is more than just the father of democracy.

In general, the idea of democracy is that voters get to elect representatives who rule over them for a limited period. In most countries, we expect our elected representatives to act out of conscience. In Korea, though, there is a slightly different notion. It is that the people themselves rule. The election deal with presidents, for example, is that the people choose a person who gets to meet famous foreigners, turns up at places with muscly men with earpieces and generally feels like she's somebody.

But she's there to do the people's bidding.

As former President Kim Dae-jung used to say, "The people are God."

The reason the beast has been awoken to fury now is because President Park has violated the holy arrangement. She put her friend in the people's place and took orders from her. She has broken the first commandment which says, "Thou shalt have no other gods but me."

This theology makes for powerful feelings, which is why Park will have to go.

Ask anyone and they will give you some version of this.

"Every single passenger I have spoken to thinks the President no longer deserves to be in Cheong Wa Dae. She belongs in a mental hospital," said one of Seoul City's taxi drivers, whom as regular readers of this column will know, I defer to for political analysis.

But in this picture, something interesting is happening. The growing evidence, mostly in the form of information coming out of the prosecutor's office, but also some investigative work by newspapers, is altering the original picture — which awoke the beast — of a docile Park taking orders from a manipulative Choi.

Now, the focus is on whether Park directed Choi and herself benefited from Choi's leveraging of her relationship with the center of power.

As this theme plays out, we should not expect the people to say, "Oh, we got it wrong. It's just old-fashioned corruption. I'm going home."

It's too late for that.

Although the reasons the people were worked into a hysterical fury and started demanding Park quit may have no basis in law, the crimes eventually unearthed will provide the basis in law to remove her.

Public sentiment will not be denied.

Michael Breen is the CEO of Insight Communications Consultants, a public relations company, and author of "The Koreans" and "Kim Jong-il: North Korea's Dear Leader."

Site Map E-paper Subscribe Register LogIn
Site Map E-paper Subscribe Register LogIn