The Korea Times close
National
  • Politics
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Multicultural Community
  • Defense
  • Environment & Animals
  • Law & Crime
  • Society
  • Health & Science
Business
  • Tech
  • Bio
  • Companies
Finance
  • Companies
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Cryptocurrency
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to President
  • Letter to the Editor
Lifestyle
  • Travel & Food
  • Trends
  • People & Events
  • Books
  • Around Town
  • Fortune Telling
Entertainment
& Arts
  • K-pop
  • Films
  • Shows & Dramas
  • Music
  • Theater & Others
Sports
World
  • SCMP
  • Asia
Video
  • Culture
  • People
  • News
Photos
  • Photo News
  • Darkroom
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to President
  • Letter to the Editor
Thu, August 11, 2022 | 14:05
Guest Column
What's next for the WTO?
Posted : 2013-12-23 17:11
Updated : 2013-12-23 17:11
Print Preview
Font Size Up
Font Size Down
By Lori Wallach and Ben Beachy

Roberto Azevdo, the new WTO head, has earned praise for avoiding the implosion that has characterized many past WTO meetings. However, the real question is what lesson the new director general should draw from his intense first few months of leadership.

The Bali deal indicates that, while attempts to expand the scope and jurisdiction of the WTO do not enjoy support from most member countries, Azevdo may find more support in heeding longstanding calls to alter existing rules.

If Azevdo is to take this lesson to heart and chart a new direction for the world's most powerful commerce organization, he can take a cue from his home country. Brazil has proven successful in challenging old globalization agendas and crafting its own trade policy.

Brazil stands out because it was one of the few countries that wisely refused to subject its financial services sector to the WTO's broad deregulation requirements. Unlike those countries that did, Brazil weathered the 2007-8 global financial crisis with limited impact.

Another example of Brazil's savvy is its refusal to accept an obscure-sounding provision that is usually buried in the trade and investment agreements and pushed onto other countries by the United States and the E.U.

Known as "investor-state" dispute resolution (ISDR), this mechanism empowers foreign corporations to bypass the domestic legal systems of the countries in which they operate. Instead, it allows them to drag sovereign host governments before extrajudicial tribunals with a stunning demand _ compensate corporations for health or environmental policies (or other government actions) that investors find inconvenient.

These tribunals are comprised of three private sector attorneys, unaccountable to any electorate. And yet, they are empowered to decide whether an important public interest policy should be deemed a violation of expansive, but vaguely-worded foreign investor privileges.

For example, a Peruvian anti-toxics policy is now being attacked by a U.S. corporation, as is Canada's medicine patent policy. And U.S. tobacco behemoth Philip Morris has launched cases against progressive anti-smoking laws in Uruguay and Australia, after failing to undermine the health laws in domestic courts.

To outsiders, this may sound like a conspiracy theory. If only. In the name of investment promotion, U.S. trade negotiators over the past two decades have quietly inserted these far-reaching provisions into a panoply of "free trade" agreements (FTAs) signed with 17 mainly developing countries, from Mexico and Chile to Oman and Morocco. European countries have inked nearly 1,000 Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) that contain the same mechanism with developing countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia.

As a result, U.S. and EU oil, pharmaceutical and other corporations are now launching an unprecedented wave of these investor-state cases. The U.N. reports that the cumulative number has jumped tenfold since 2000.

Corporations are using this tool to go up against consumer safeguards, environmental laws, financial regulations and other polices that they claim inhibit their "expected future profits." These tribunals have already ordered governments to pay billions to foreign corporations, while billions more in claims remain pending.

Given that, why would any country want to sign on to such a one-sided system? Most likely, it is a case of deceptive advertising. Sweeping investor privileges, it was reasoned, were required to attract a steady flow of investment into developing countries. Investor-state clauses were originally presented as promoting investments. In reality, they have turned into a Trojan horse.

If the agreements had worked as advertised, Brazil ― which has steadfastly refused to accede to these tribunals ― should be hurting for investment after rebuffing BITs and U.S. FTAs that enshrine the ISDR system. And Peru, having ratified nearly two-dozen investment treaties and signed onto an ISDR-embodying U.S. FTA with the United States, should be a darling of foreign investors.

The reality is the opposite. The U.N. reports that in 2012 Brazil was the world's fourth most popular destination for foreign investment, only outdone by the United States, Hong Kong and China.

While Brazil easily clinched Latin America's top spot as a foreign investment magnet, Peru ranked as one of the region's lowest foreign investment recipients. Indeed, study after study has found zero correlation between a country's submission of its public policies to the whims of investor-state tribunals and its ability to attract foreign investment.

No wonder then that South Africa is in the process of terminating its BITs with investor-state enforcement, as is Ecuador. Countries such as Bolivia and Venezuela have withdrawn from the World Bank forum where most investor-state cases are tried.

The opposition to these dubious tribunals has also reached the Global North. After a multi-year review under the past conservative government, Australia concluded that the investor-state regime was not in its national interest. It refuses to be subjected to the U.S.-proposed expansion of the investor-state system through the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a sweeping FTA currently under negotiation.

Given Brazil's proven success in refusing such costly schemes and engaging in the global economy on more pragmatic terms, will Roberto Azev do take a cue from his home country, learn from the recent backpedaling in the Bali deal and bring a new perspective to the WTO? The odds may be long, but the world can only hope so.

Lori Wallach is director, and Ben Beach is research director, of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch. This article is part of Ford Foundation's "Reforming Global Finance Governance" project.

 
LG
  • Korea urged to take preemptive steps to deal with climate change-induced disasters
  • What Seoul's worst rainfall in 115 years looked like
  • Musinsa's new store becomes hot spot in southern Seoul
  • Flood damage to vehicles during torrential rain to hit insurers
  • 'Children must play right now'
  • Bill Gates expected to meet with top business leaders in Korea
  • Seoul reiterates that '3 Nos' policy is not commitment to China
  • Han River sunset cruise: Seoul's new tourist focal point
  • [INTERVIEW] Polish arms deal may well lead to greater opportunities for Korea: expert
  • Retailers slash product prices to draw consumers as inflation soars
  • Interactive News
  • With tough love,
  • 'Santa dogs' help rebuild burnt forests in Andong
  • 'Santa dogs' help rebuild burnt forests in Andong
  • A tale of natural wine
    • BLACKPINK to start world tour in October BLACKPINK to start world tour in October
    • [INTERVIEW] Im Si-wan finds own narrative for villain role in 'Emergency Declaration' [INTERVIEW] Im Si-wan finds own narrative for villain role in 'Emergency Declaration'
    • 'Free Chol Soo Lee': How young Korean immigrant's wrongful conviction led to pan Asian American resistance movement 'Free Chol Soo Lee': How young Korean immigrant's wrongful conviction led to pan Asian American resistance movement
    • 'Good Doctor' director to debut Netflix's high-strung suspense series, 'A Model Family' 'Good Doctor' director to debut Netflix's high-strung suspense series, 'A Model Family'
    • Musical 'Kinky Boots' tells people to love themselves as they are Musical 'Kinky Boots' tells people to love themselves as they are
    DARKROOM
    • Ice is melting, land is burning

      Ice is melting, land is burning

    • Tottenham 6-3 Team K League

      Tottenham 6-3 Team K League

    • Afghanistan earthquake killed more than 1,000

      Afghanistan earthquake killed more than 1,000

    • Divided America reacts to overturn of Roe vs. Wade

      Divided America reacts to overturn of Roe vs. Wade

    • Namaste: Yogis to celebrate International Yoga Day

      Namaste: Yogis to celebrate International Yoga Day

    The Korea Times
    CEO & Publisher : Oh Young-jin
    Digital News Email : webmaster@koreatimes.co.kr
    Tel : 02-724-2114
    Online newspaper registration No : 서울,아52844
    Date of registration : 2020.02.05
    Masthead : The Korea Times
    Copyright © koreatimes.co.kr. All rights reserved.
    • About Us
    • Introduction
    • History
    • Location
    • Media Kit
    • Contact Us
    • Products & Service
    • Subscribe
    • E-paper
    • Mobile Service
    • RSS Service
    • Content Sales
    • Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
    • 고충처리인
    • Youth Protection Policy
    • Code of Ethics
    • Copyright Policy
    • Family Site
    • Hankook Ilbo
    • Dongwha Group