Opinion
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Opinion > Today`s Column > Thursday, September 9, 2010 | 8:4 p.m. ET
  Nation
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
    Editorial  
    Thoughts of the Times  
    Today`s Column  
    Lee Chang-sup Column  
    Desk Column  
    Letter to the Editor  
    The Dawn of Modern Korea  
    Another Korea  
    What`s Your Take?  
    Letter from America  
    Random Walk  
    Sean Hayes  
    Michael Breen  
    On Second Thought  
    Views From Overseas  
    Andrei Lankov  
    Jon Huer  
    Tom Plate  
    Living Science  
    Pacific Perspective  
    Guest Column  
    Times Forum  
    Readers` Forum  
    Cartoon  
    Great and Simple Things  
    Back Home  
    Ideas & Ideals  
    Jim Hoagland  
    Choi Yearn-hong  
    Today in History  
    Reporter's Notebook  
    Washington Lounge  
    Hyon O'Brien  
  Community
  Special
  The Learning Times
     About English News  
     iBT TOEFL  
     Essay  
     
 
   07-29-2010 15:07 여성 음성 듣기 남성 음성 듣기
Obama loses backing in Afghan war

By Dale McFeatters
Scripps Howard News Service

The House vote on an emergency spending bill shows that President Barack Obama faces weakening support among his own Democrats for his determination to keep prosecuting the war in Afghanistan.

The $59 billion bill ― the largest part of which is $33 billion to support the president's 33,000-troop surge ― passed 308 to 114 Tuesday thanks to substantial Republican support. In fact, more Republicans, 160, voted for the bill than Democrats, 148.

Only 12 Republicans voted against the measure while 102 Democrats opposed it, including Rep. David Obey, Wis., the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

The leak of the 92,000 military documents to WikiLeaks and the media played little role in the debate. The conventional wisdom is that those documents didn't disclose anything that wasn't already known or couldn't reasonably been guessed. As Obama put it, the "documents don't reveal any issues that haven't already informed our public debate on Afghanistan." In any case, support among Democrats had been softening before the release.

Obama asked for the emergency money, which also includes funds for disaster relief, benefits for veterans exposed to Agent Orange and some foreign aid programs, in February. The Senate approved the money early this month.

But the House, in part to entice wavering liberals, added $20 billion in student aid and funds to retain teachers facing layoffs. The Senate, newly antsy over heavy spending, refused to go along. The bill failed a procedural vote, 46 to 51, failing to get even a simple majority let alone the 60 votes necessary to shut off the inevitable filibuster. Shorn of the $20 billion, the bill passed by voice vote.

The House leadership was now in a corner. It had to pass the pared down measure; the Pentagon had said it would begin running out of money for the troops in Afghanistan around Aug. 7 when the House would be gone for summer recess, not to return until after Labor Day.

But one way or another the bill was going to pass. Support may be dwindling, but a telling indicator was the vote on a resolution by Reps. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, and Ron Paul, R-Texas, calling on Obama to begin an immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan.

It failed 38 to 372. As always, the lawmakers are extremely leery of crossing a president during wartime.

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com)

Reader’s Comments
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
Managerial regulations
◀ Back ▲Top