Opinion
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Opinion > Sean Hayes > Wednesday, February 15, 2012 | 6:29 a.m. ET
  National
  Biz/Finance
  BusinessFocus
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
    Editorial  
    Thoughts of the Times  
    Today`s Column  
    Lee Chang-sup Column  
    Desk Column  
    Letter to the Editor  
    The Dawn of Modern Korea  
    Another Korea  
    What`s Your Take?  
    Letter from America  
    Random Walk  
    Sean Hayes  
    Michael Breen  
    On Second Thought  
    Views From Overseas  
    Andrei Lankov  
    Jon Huer  
    Jay Kim  
    Untold Stories  
    Tom Plate  
    Bukchon Journal  
    Living Science  
    Pacific Perspective  
    Oh Kong-dan  
    Diplomatic Periscope  
    On Cultural Heritage  
    Guest Column  
    Times Forum  
    Readers` Forum  
    Shin Hyun-gook  
    Cartoon  
    Great and Simple Things  
    Thinking Aloud  
    Ideas & Ideals  
    Jim Hoagland  
    Choi Yearn-hong  
    Today in History  
    Reporter's Notebook  
    Washington Lounge  
    Hyon O'Brien  
    Andrew Salmon  
    Jason Lim  
    Donald Kirk  
    Toward multiculturalism  
  Community
  Special
  Science
  The Learning Times
     About English News
     iBT TOEFL
     Essay
     
 
   02-05-2009 15:15 여성 음성 남성 음성
To Prove Your Innocence


Participants take an oath at a mock trial in the Seoul Central District Court, southern Seoul, in May 2007. The justice reform committee organized the event to experiment with the jury system. The country introduced the system last year on a trial basis. / Korea Times

By Sean Hayes

It is time for Korea to consider adopting a grand jury system. The conviction rate in Korea is nearly 100 percent. An innocent defendant who cannot afford a good attorney stands little chance of a not-guilty verdict.

In the most politically sensitive of cases, even an innocent defendant with a good advocate stands little chance of obtaining a not-guilty verdict.

The situation is improving, however, because younger judges, these days, tend to focus more attention on the prosecutor's obligation to meet the burden of production and proof.

Still, the cards are heavily stacked against an innocent defendant without access to a good advocate.

A grand jury system would reduce the number of wrongful convictions by adding an additional check on the power of the prosecutor to indict.

The grand jury system is only intended for those few defendants who fall through the cracks because of the heavy burden placed on the system and the few bad apples within the system.

On a grand jury, common citizens ― a defendant's peers ― consider a prosecutor's basic evidence, and the grand jury decides whether there is probable cause to indict. The grand jury's decision to indict can be reached by a simple majority vote of its members.

Under the U.S. federal system, the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that all charges for capital and ``infamous'' crimes must be presented to a grand jury.

The courts have interpreted the Fifth Amendment to mean that all felonies must be presented to a grand jury and that the right to a grand jury may be waived by a defendant.

The Fifth Amendment has also been interpreted as only binding the federal government, and that states can choose whether to adopt a grand jury system in their own constitutions.

A federal grand jury must consist of between 16 and 23 individuals sworn in by a judge. The grand jury has the power to subpoena witnesses, documents, and physical evidence and then decide, based on this evidence, if probable cause exists to indict.

If the grand jury decides, through a simple majority, that probable cause exists, then the prosecutor can proceed with the case. If the jury decides that probable cause does not exist, the prosecutor can only recharge the defendant for the same crime if additional information emerges.

Grand juries play a very vital role in the U.S. criminal justice system by adding to its transparency, while allowing an additional check on government.

If implemented in Korea, the system would significantly contribute to increasing the peoples' trust in a legal system that has recently been maligned, while providing a necessary check for the few that are wrongfully accused of a crime.

Sean Hayes is a New York attorney working with the Seoul office of one of Korea's leading law firms. He formerly worked as a law faculty member and for the Constitutional Court of Korea. He can be reached at the www.thekoreanlawblog.com.