Opinion
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Opinion > Editorial > Wednesday, February 10, 2010 | 6:21 a.m. ET
  Nation
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
    Editorial  
    Thoughts of the Times  
    Today`s Column  
    Desk Column  
    Letter to the Editor  
    The Dawn of Modern Korea  
    Another Korea  
    What`s Your Take?  
    Letter from America  
    Random Walk  
    Sean Hayes  
    Michael Breen  
    Views From Overseas  
    Jon Huer  
    Tom Plate  
    Living Science  
    Pacific Perspective  
    Guest Column  
    Times Forum  
    Readers` Forum  
    Cartoon  
    Great and Simple Things  
    Back Home  
    Ideas & Ideals  
    Jim Hoagland  
    Choi Yearn-hong  
    Today in History  
    Reporter's Notebook  
    Washington Lounge  
    Hyon O'Brien  
  Community
  Special
     
  The Learning Times
     Editorial Listening
     Phone English
     Dear Abby
     Domestic News
     Foreign News
     Screen English
     Live English in Drama
     Discovery Education  >
     Ancient Idiom  
     iBT Writing  
     English Writing I
     English Writing II  
     English Grammar
     Grasping Vocab
     iBT Vocab
     Korean Language  
     
     Junior Writing
     Junior Reading
     Junior Reporter
     
 
   11-27-2009 17:41 여성 음성 듣기 남성 음성 듣기
Women’s Right to Sex

Court Ruling Expected to Promote Gender Equality

A longstanding law designed to ban people from having sex under the pretense of marriage was declared unconstitutional on Thursday. The Constitutional Court ruled that the law goes against sexual equality and women's right to make their own decisions regarding sex. The ruling reflected changing social values, especially concerning sex.

In fact, the law has increasingly been considered outdated. It was enacted in 1953 to make it illegal for a person to have sexual intercourse on false promises of marriage. The criminal code has long been aimed at protecting women from being coaxed into sex with their male partners. But there have been growing concerns among both men and women that the law was the product of Korea's male-dominated Confucian culture, which denied women's right to self-determination regarding sexual activity.

In this context, the court ruling carries a symbolic meaning as it recognizes women's rights. The law has virtually become unenforceable. In 1981, 269 men were indicted for breaking the law. But the number declined to 41 in 2006 and 25 last year. Most of them were given suspended jail terms although the law stipulated that violators were subject to up to two years in prison or a maximum fine of 5 million won ($4,300). It is natural to toll a death knell for such a virtually obsolete code.

In 2002, the court decided that the law was in line with the Constitution. But now there is no reason to enforce the law any more. The Ministry of Gender Equality told the court September that the statute should be scrapped because it goes against the principle of sexual equality and undermines the dignity of women. Most feminist groups immediately welcomed the latest ruling, which they said reflected the public views against the law and the changing social trends.

We have to keep in mind the statement by Lee Kang-kook, chief justice of the nine-member court, that the law has apparently challenged sexual equality by putting undue responsibility on men. And his message is clear: the law has overtly restricted people's private lives, under the name of protecting women from men who tricked them into bed with the false promise of marriage. Nowadays, women have a more liberal attitude toward sex and a better ability to make their own decisions on their sexual behavior. The ruling is nothing less than the repealing of the nation's male chauvinistic ideology. We hope the decision will further promote gender equality and the empowerment of women.

Reader’s Comments
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
Managerial regulations
◀ Back ▲Top