Posted : 2009-02-19 15:28
Updated : 2009-02-19 15:28

NK Nukes on Top Agenda

By Scott Snyder

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrived in Seoul Thursday on her first visit to South Korea in her new capacity as U.S. Secretary of State. South Koreans have anticipated her arrival ― and the establishment of the Obama administration's policy for the Korean Peninsula ― with a mixture of anxiety and anticipation.

This mood has been fed by a rapid deterioration in inter-Korean relations, increasingly strident North Korean military threats toward the South, and preparations to launch a long-range missile.

The agenda for the visit is broad ― suggesting that the U.S.-Republic of Korea (ROK) alliance is now positioned to make contributions beyond the peninsula ― but the core preoccupation will remain how to deal with North Korea.

Initial Obama administration pronouncements dealt with North Korea exclusively in the context of nonproliferation. However, many Koreans had (erroneously) interpreted Obama campaign statements as implying that he would pursue an American version of Kim Dae-jung's Sunshine Policy toward the North.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton waves at Tokyo International Airport Wednesday as she leaves Japan for Indonesia for the second leg of her Asian tour. She arrived in Seoul, Thursday, to discuss North Korea’s nuclear program, regional security and other pending issues with South Korean officials.
/ AFP-Yonhap
Although Clinton has criticized the Bush administration harshly for abandoning the Agreed Framework, her speech at the New York-based Asia Society prior to her departure for Asia emphasized continuity with the foundations laid by the second Bush administration, with the September 2005 six-party joint statement serving as the foundation for a framework that will combine multilateral and bilateral negotiations.

Her speech affirmed that the United States will pursue diplomatic normalization, a peace agreement and economic development in North Korea, but also that such possibilities are linked to North Korea's denuclearization.

Clinton's speech, along with public statements warning North Korea that a long-range missile test would lead to negative consequences for the North, and unconfirmed reports that former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Stephen Bosworth might be named as the administration's point person for North Korea, have been welcome news to South Koreans ahead of her visit.

But there are still nagging worries in Seoul that the Korean issue will get lost in the shuffle of other pressing issues facing the Obama administration.

Although North Korea's traditional blustery rhetoric and crisis escalation measures are familiar, they highlight the complexity of the North Korean challenge: its nuclear weapons capability is unacceptable, but analysts increasingly suggest that North Korea will not give them up under any circumstances, implying no choice but acceptance of the North's nuclear status.

Moreover, its internal political situation is fragile, with a defensive and weakening political elite that may find itself less able to steer a consistent path, but unlikely to lose power completely.

Moreover, North Korea's policy of engaging the United States, while marginalizing South Korea, seems designed to ensure the perpetuation of tension on the Korean Peninsula. This situation requires extraordinarily close cooperation between Washington and Seoul. Secretary Clinton's visit establishes the relationships among leaders necessary to address this challenge.

Clinton has stated that her main objective during her first visit to Asia is to ``listen," meaning that what South Korean leaders say and do (whether or not such actions can win support from the Korean public) will shape the near-term potential of the relationship, particularly with regard to South Korea's potential contributions to helping curb international pirates off the Somali coast and post-conflict stabilization in Afghanistan.

Instead of responding to U.S. requests for assistance in global ``hot spots," South Korea should establish its contributions to the international community based on its own perceived interests, knowing that international perceptions of Korea's prestige and influence as a global leader will depend on its capacity and willingness to undertake commensurate responsibilities.

The alliance with the United States may be an effective vehicle and platform for enhancing the value and effectiveness of South Korean contributions to such efforts.

Recent opinion polls conducted by the East Asia Institute in Seoul suggest an upswing in South Korean public support for the alliance in early 2009.

In this regard, perceptions among South Koreans that a conservative South Korean leadership will be out of synch with the Obama administration's mantle of change may be unfounded: Both leaders say they are pragmatic (although President Lee Myung-bak has not reached out to opposition leaders in the National Assembly to the same extent that Obama has tried to win over Republican support in the U.S. Congress).

If so, Clinton's visit could mark the opening of an opportunity to consolidate and deepen alliance cooperation on the basis of a broader range of mutual interests than has existed in the past.

Scott Snyder is director of the Asia Foundation's Center for U.S.-Korea Policy and an adjunct senior fellow for Korean studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. The opinions expressed above are his personal views. He can be reached at
  • 1. Korean-Nigerian model breaks through barriers
  • 2. Koreans join Women's March against new US president
  • 3. US asks Korea to arrest Ban Ki-moon's brother
  • 4. Korea concerned about Trump's 'America first' policy
  • 5. Seoul already paying enough for USFK
  • 6. Homosexuality missing from sex education
  • 7. 2 Filipino cops arrested for murdering Korean
  • 8. Ban Ki-moon may end up a storm in a teacup
  • 9. 4.5 mil. Koreans 'virtually jobless'
  • 10. Korea's Big Mac Index drops to 25th