Opinion
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Opinion > Editorial > Tuesday, February 14, 2012 | 7:48 p.m. ET
  National
  Biz/Finance
  BusinessFocus
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
    Editorial  
    Thoughts of the Times  
    Today`s Column  
    Lee Chang-sup Column  
    Desk Column  
    Letter to the Editor  
    The Dawn of Modern Korea  
    Another Korea  
    What`s Your Take?  
    Letter from America  
    Random Walk  
    Sean Hayes  
    Michael Breen  
    On Second Thought  
    Views From Overseas  
    Andrei Lankov  
    Jon Huer  
    Jay Kim  
    Untold Stories  
    Tom Plate  
    Bukchon Journal  
    Living Science  
    Pacific Perspective  
    Oh Kong-dan  
    Diplomatic Periscope  
    On Cultural Heritage  
    Guest Column  
    Times Forum  
    Readers` Forum  
    Shin Hyun-gook  
    Cartoon  
    Great and Simple Things  
    Thinking Aloud  
    Ideas & Ideals  
    Jim Hoagland  
    Choi Yearn-hong  
    Today in History  
    Reporter's Notebook  
    Washington Lounge  
    Hyon O'Brien  
    Andrew Salmon  
    Jason Lim  
    Donald Kirk  
    Toward multiculturalism  
  Community
  Special
  Science
  The Learning Times
     About English News
     iBT TOEFL
     Essay
     
 
   01-27-2009 17:55 여성 음성 남성 음성
Samsung Shock

Fire Has Spread to Main Street in Korea, Too

Samsung Electronics' first-ever net loss in the October-December quarter came as a shock, not just in psychological terms but in substantive meaning.

Friday's report, coming on the heels of gloomy news, including Ssangyong Motor's filing for court receivership and Hyundai Motor's plunging profits, means the fire of the financial crisis has now spread not just to the traditional industries like automobiles but also to IT, more susceptible to changes in consumer income.

It also signifies the global financial turmoil and ensuing economic recession have begun to squeeze the bottom lines of the nation's manufacturing sector as a whole, which relies heavily on the overseas export market.

With its main export locomotives crippled like these, it's of no surprise that the nation's economy contracted 3.4 percent in the three months ended Dec. 31 for the first time since the fourth quarter of 1998 when Korea was in the throes of the Asian economic crisis triggered by problems in giant business groups, causing an eerie sense of deja vu.

Fortunately, the business community seems to have learned something from the crisis 11 years ago, overhauling their production process and marketing strategy, as well as tightening their belts, as shown by the voluntary slashing of executive pay and the return of their stock options. If and when these self-help efforts and bold R&D investment and other long-term strategies pay off, the current crisis should turn into opportunity.

What has hardly changed is the government sector, if the Lee Myung-bak administration's personnel management is any indication.

Looking back on the past year of ``MB-nomics,'' one finds mistaken forecasts, wrong moves and conflicting signals. Totally unaware of the looming crisis from abroad, the government stuck to its growth-first policy, wasting lots of previous foreign reserves in the process. While trumpeting loudly about the need for a market economy, it employed 1970s-style economic control, slashed payrolls at state enterprises while calling for new job creation, and urged banks to increase lending while calling for them to improve capital adequacy ratios at the same time.

The government is also moving toward deregulation and privatization in an era of re-regulation and re-nationalization. The governing camp is still praising itself for tax cuts for the wealthy, which will drain governmental resources for any significant economic stimulus, vital to sustaining the national economy during the economic slump.

President Lee only recently sacked his economic czar behind the fiasco ― only to name him head of a blue-ribbon panel on national competitiveness, dashing cold water on public expectations of an entirely new economic team.

Holding meetings underground may appear dramatic, but depending on the participants and policies, the outcome could be comedic.