Opinion
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw 음성듣기 설치 및 이용방법    Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Opinion > Today`s Column > Saturday, November 21, 2009 | 1:25 p.m. ET
  Nation
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
    Editorial  
    Thoughts of the Times  
    Today`s Column  
    Desk Column  
    Letter to the Editor  
    The Dawn of Modern Korea  
    Another Korea  
    What`s Your Take?  
    Letter from America  
    Random Walk  
    Sean Hayes  
    Michael Breen  
    Views From Overseas  
    Jon Huer  
    Tom Plate  
    Living Science  
    Pacific Perspective  
    Guest Column  
    Times Forum  
    Readers` Forum  
    Cartoon  
    Great and Simple Things  
    Back Home  
    Ideas & Ideals  
    Jim Hoagland  
    Choi Yearn-hong  
    Today in History  
    Reporter's Notebook  
    Washington Lounge  
    Hyon O'Brien  
  Community
  Special
     
  The Learning Times
     Editorial Listening
     Phone English
     Dear Abby
     Domestic News
     Foreign News
     Screen English
     Live English in Drama
     Discovery Education  
     Ancient Idiom  
     iBT Writing  
     English Writing I
     English Writing II  
     English Grammar
     Grasping Vocab
     iBT Vocab
     Korean Language  
     
     Junior Writing
     Junior Reading
     Junior Reporter
     
 
   01-13-2009 16:47
Oil Spill and Boycott of Korean Products


By Mark Shryock

The imprisonment of the Hebei Spirit's two most senior officers, Master Jasprit Chawla and Syam Chetan, for allowing their ship to be rammed while at safe anchor by a barge owned by Samsung Heavy Industries has infuriated the global maritime community, India, and the world at large.

Calls for a boycott of products from Korea, and especially those produced by Samsung, are now beginning to be heard from across the globe.

The two men, both Indian nationals, have been detained in Korea under house arrest since the worst oil spill in Korea's history occurred in December 2007. Despite being found innocent by a Korean lower court, the Korean prosecution appealed the case and won.

On Dec. 10, Chawla and Chetan were handcuffed and led off to serve a sentence of 18 months and eight months, respectively. They are rapidly becoming international heroes while at the same time Korea grows more and more unpopular.

The irony is that while their case is gaining international momentum on a daily basis, in Korea the imprisonment of Chawla and Chetan has prompted little interest.

But scrutiny of the case should be raised in Korea immediately because it is beginning to damage Korea's public image abroad. There has been much talk lately about branding Korea. Unfortunately, this issue is branding Korea in the worst ways possible.

The shipping world is starting to threaten the halting of all shipments to Korea. This is in addition to an already well-organized movement in the shipping world and India to create a global boycott of Korean goods.

The U.K. newspaper, the Financial Times, recently published an article saying that, ``If the boycott movement grows, Korea will be placed in a very serious situation, as it imports all of its energy from abroad."

Korea should be seriously concerned over this possible scenario. But Korea should also be concerned that at a time of a global financial crisis the international financial media is beginning to print speculation of the possible financial consequences of such boycotts.

I can say personally that I have met with a group of internationally connected bankers who feel this issue is already hurting Korea and has the potential to be catastrophic.

In addition to this, thousands have already gathered in protest rallies in India. Calls for a boycott of Korean products are now numerous and growing daily. This is now spreading beyond just the shipping industry and India, and is beginning to be heard in growing sectors around the world.

The Chosun Ilbo also quoted a Chennai-based member of the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency (KOTRA) as saying,``When you consider the inclinations of the Indian people, the large-scale demonstrations by the Indian sailors' organizations could spark a widespread boycott of Korean goods such as Hyundai cars and Samsung and LG electronics, so the government has to take effective counter-action."

The KOTRA official was quoted as adding, ``If the sailors are not released then Hyundai cars might not be able to come in."

Internationally, Korea is also beginning to look corrupt and vindictive, which is a brand image Korea can ill afford.

Wikipedia states, ``According to Lloyd's List and other media reports, Korean maritime officials, prosecutors and Samsung lawyers have been accused of colluding in the retrial of the two senior officers.''

According to Wikipedia, Robert Giorgi, president of management firm V.Ships told the press he is concerned at recent developments ``which point to collusion.'' He stated this prior to the appeal and also said that he did not feel confident the men would get a fair trial.

The fact that in print all over the world are the words ``efforts of Samsung and prosecutors look to be designed (so) that the master and the chief officers are found guilty on appeal'' should be a cause of great concern.

It means the rest of the world is having extreme difficulty in understanding the verdict arrived at on appeal Dec. 10. Many Koreans are sympathetic to the fisherman and feel someone should be punished regardless of the technical guilt.

Indeed, this may be what drove the prosecutors to retry this case ― and not collusion. I have seen no clear evidence that shows any collusion between Samsung and the prosecutors. But this does not matter.

To much of the rest of the world, this verdict is such a mockery of justice that collusion seems the only plausible answer. Korea needs to understand it can no longer afford this kind of justice and that the cultural need for this kind of justice had better be rethought.

This issue is not going to go away and the longer Korea detains these men, the greater the negative branding is going to be.

I have a master's degree in restoration ecology. My degree and expertise are designed to fix in nature what humans have harmed. Because of my love of the earth, I feel rage and despair over the Taean oil spill.

I understand deeply the grief and anger all Koreans feel over this disaster. I never thought as an ecology writer I would be writing an article that argues for the freedom of anyone connected to something so damaging to the earth.

But the more I looked into the imprisonment of Chawla and Chetan I knew that's what I had to do. They are not responsible for the great wound Korea has suffered over the oil spill. On Dec. 31, I went to the Indian embassy and met with Mrs. Chawla and Mrs. Chetan.

I sat across from them and looked into their tear-filled eyes and promised them I would write this story. But I did not write this story just for them.

I see a great nation, a nation that I have grown to know and love, inflicting great harm upon itself. Let Chawla and Mr Chetan go free and let all of us begin the great work of healing from this deep wound.

Mark Shryock is professor of English at Kangnung National University's Wonju Campus in Gangwon Province. He is also a writer, ecologist, and artist who came from Joplin, Mo., in the United States. He can be reached at Markshryock@yahoo.com The views expressed in the above article are those of the author and do not reflect the editorial policy of The Korea Times.

Reader’s Comments
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
fcia   (76.254.66.210)   01-14-2009 10:07
Jimbo - before telling people about white envelopes that you never saw personally, you should indicate where you are getting your information from. Who told you that the judge got a white envelope from anyone? Second, if you can prove to me that the oil tanker was parked properly then I will accept your argument. But I heard on the local MBC news that they were parked illegally, otherwise the whole case really do not make any sense and I too will side with the Indian sailors.
fcia   (76.254.66.210)   01-14-2009 10:00
Mark Shryock did not seem to call for boycott of an Somalian products when the same Indian captain was kidnapped/hijacked by them before. Why is this guy getting involved only in this case and advocating boycott. Was he paid and how much and by who? Mark Shryock should disclose his relations with them more honestly.
fcia   (76.254.66.210)   01-14-2009 09:51
Jimbo - You are not correct factually and your logics are even worse, all twisted. Your fellow American, I want money for my pants Judge, would be very proud. Two wrongs do not make one right. Both parties are responsible in my case and in the oil spill case. It was wrong and poor judgment to park explosives next to a school and it was wrong to park oil tankers on a heavy traffic area fully knowing that construction was active, plus it was a illegal zone.
fcia   (76.254.66.210)   01-14-2009 09:03
raven - Laughable as always. Tug boats are used to pull the ship into the harbor not while they wait outside the harbor area waiting to be tugged in. Wrong logic...try better next time.
fcia   (76.254.66.210)   01-14-2009 07:40
Being stationary does not mean you are automatically innocent. If I park my TNT filled truck next to a school and a drunken driver runs into me blowing up the whole school, who is responsible? There is a reason why you cannot park in certain areas and it is especially important when you are carrying a dangerous materials.
Managerial regulations
◀ Back ▲Top