alt
Posted : 2009-01-15 18:55
Updated : 2009-01-15 18:55

Buildings Protected by Copyright

By Park Si-soo
Staff Reporter

A court ruled Thursday that shooting a commercial ad against the backdrop of a building without the approval of the architect constitutes copyright infringement, but is limited to those built according to the architect’s ``unique, thus inimitable’’ creativity.

This is the first ruling of its kind in Korea.

The Seoul Central District Court made the ruling after ad agency Pomato reached an agreement with architect Min Kyu-am to pay 10 million won ($7,300) in compensation for shooting an ad for Kookmin Bank, aired between August 2005 and May 2006, with a uniquely-shaped construction called ``UV House,’’ designed by Min, in Paju, Gyeonggi Province, as the background.

In the ruling, the court said, ``the building is apparently a creative output of the architect bearing inimitable beauty. Images of buildings and facilities in open space may be freely used for non-commercial purposes but that’s not the case here.’’

pss@koreatimes.co.kr
  • 1. Health alerts issued as fine dust blankets Korean Peninsula
  • 2. Comfort women were Japan's shocking human rights violations: Lippert
  • 3. Ban Ki-moon haunted by awkward slip-ups
  • 4. Cameras at brothels cause stir
  • 5. Diplomacy dead between Seoul, Tokyo
  • 6. Court denies Samsung chief's arrest for 'lack of evidence'
  • 7. Trump won't give concessions to Korea
  • 8. Moon Jae-in extends lead after Ban's return: poll
  • 9. Former Japan sex slavery victim dies at 94
  • 10. Samsung chief awaits court decision on arrest