The Korea Times close
National
  • Politics
  • Diplomacy
  • Defense
  • Labor & Environment
  • Law & Crime
  • Health & Welfare
  • Embassy
  • Seoul & Provinces
  • Education
  • Foreign Communities
  • Obituaries
Biz & Tech
  • Auto
  • IT
  • Game
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail & Food
  • Energy
  • Construction
  • Airlines
Finance
  • Policies
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Banks
  • Non-banks
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to the Editor
Lifestyle
  • Arts
  • Books
  • Travel & Cuisine
  • Trend
  • Fashion
  • Around Town
  • Fortune Telling
Entertainment
  • K-pop
  • K-dramas & Shows
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Performances
  • Asia Model Festival
Sports
  • Football
  • Golf
  • Baseball
  • Other Sports
World
  • Asia Pacific
  • Americas
  • Europe & Africa
  • SCMP
Video
  • On the Spot
  • Feature
  • News
Photos
  • Photo News
  • Darkroom
Community
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
National
  • Politics
  • Diplomacy
  • Defense
  • Labor & Environment
  • Law & Crime
  • Health & Welfare
  • Embassy
  • Seoul & Provinces
  • Education
  • Foreign Communities
  • Obituaries
Sun, March 7, 2021 | 02:28
-------------------------
1910 Korea-Japan annexation treaty invalid
Posted : 2010-08-11 17:00
Updated : 2010-08-11 17:00
Mail
Print Preview
Font Size Up
Font Size Down
Korean edict of annexation pact lacked state seal

By Lee Tae-hoon

A Korean scholar has unveiled evidence proving that the Japan-Korea annexation treaty of 1910 was invalid under international law.

Lee Tae-jin, professor emeritus at Seoul National University, released historical documents that show the century-old annexation pact was void because Korea’s proclamation of the treaty lacked the nation’s state seal.

According to Lee, the original copy of the Korean proclamation contained only King Sunjong’s private seal, which was used solely for administrative approval. The Korean edict lacked his signature and the required state seal

In contrast, the Japanese edict of the treaty had Japan’s state seal and the signature of Emperor Meiji, who signed it with his personal name Mutsuhito.

The discrepancies in the format of the two royal documents counter Japan’s assertion that the annexation took effect legally with the approval of King Sunjong.

The controversial treaty was signed on Aug. 22, 1910, between pro-Japanese Prime Minister Lee Wan-yong and Japanese Governor General of Korea Terauchi Masatake.

The pact claims that Korea’s king “makes complete and permanent cession” to Japan over Korea.

“The documents show that the annexation treaty didn’t meet legal requirements,” Lee said. “When you compare the two edicts, it’s obvious that King Sunjong never agreed to the treaty.”

For years, activists from both Korea and Japan have demanded that Japan admit the treaty was illegal because it was forced upon the Korean people. On Tuesday, Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan expressed deep regret over the suffering inflicted during Japan’s colonial rule from 1910 to 1945.

However, experts said his remarks fell short of expectations as they imply that Japan’s forced annexation of Korea was legitimate, though morally wrong.

“Kan’s remarks appear to be a repeat of Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama’s apology in 1995, through which the Japanese government admitted for the first time that annexation was unjust, though it still maintained that it was valid,” Doh See-hwan, a research fellow at the Northeast Asian History Foundation said.

He claimed that all remarks by Japanese prime ministers, including Junichiro Koizumi in 2005, were empty words because they ignored the fact that the treaty failed to meet legal requirements.

The two nations normalized diplomatic relations in 1965 with the Treaty of Basic Relations, which declared that all treaties or agreements signed before Aug. 22, 1910, were “already null and void.”

However, Japan continues to claim that the annexation was valid at that time and was later nullified by Korea’s liberation in 1945.

The copies of the edict will be displayed at an upcoming historic exhibition on modern history of Korea-Japan relations to be held Aug. 20 to 30 at the National Assembly Library.
Emailleeth@koreatimes.co.kr Article ListMore articles by this reporter









 
 
  • Reporting on Korean digital sex crimes: Western comparison
  • Unflattering views of Fusan in 1917
  • Scandal-ridden Olympic short track champion applies for Chinese citizenship
  • Philadelphia council resolution condemns Harvard professor for defending Japan's sexual slavery
  • My experience of teaching English to North Korean defectors
  • New virus cases over 400
  • Seoul tasked with complex challenges ahead of visit of US diplomatic, defense policy chiefs
  • Is Kakao seeking to acquire eBay Korea?
  • Pope Francis meets with top Shiite cleric in Iraq
  • Moon calls for release of Myanmar's Aung San Suu Kyi, condemns military crackdown
  • K-pop fans hung out to dry over Kakao-Spotify music licensing termination K-pop fans hung out to dry over Kakao-Spotify music licensing termination
  • BTS named Global Recording Artist of 2020 BTS named Global Recording Artist of 2020
  • Korean director Hong Sang-soo wins best screenplay for 'Introduction' at Berlin film fest Korean director Hong Sang-soo wins best screenplay for 'Introduction' at Berlin film fest
  • In new film 'Fighter,' North Korean defector finds hope and meaning through boxing In new film 'Fighter,' North Korean defector finds hope and meaning through boxing
  • Harry and Meghan hunker down as Hollywood life stays on hold Harry and Meghan hunker down as Hollywood life stays on hold
DARKROOM
  • Bloody Sunday in Myanmar

    Bloody Sunday in Myanmar

  • Earth is suffering

    Earth is suffering

  • NASA's Perseverance rover is landing on Mars

    NASA's Perseverance rover is landing on Mars

  • Fun in the snow, sledding for everyone

    Fun in the snow, sledding for everyone

  • Our children deserve better: Part 3

    Our children deserve better: Part 3

  • About Korea Times
  • CEO Message
  • Times History
  • Content Sales
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Service
  • Mobile Service
  • RSS Service
  • 고충처리인
  • hankookilbo
  • Dongwha Group
  • Code of Ethics
Copyright