National
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > National > Nation Digest >
  National
    Photo News  
    Political Digest  
    Nation Digest  
    Provincial News  
    Defense Affairs  
    Airline News  
    Foreign Affairs / N.Korea  
    History  
    Seoul Air Show  
    Obituary  
    Earth in danger  
    2012 Nuclear Security Summit  
    Icons & influencers  
    The Uncharted Path  
    Global Women's Leadership Conference  
    Essay Contest on 21st Century East Asian Community  
    Dokdo Essay Contest  
    Ieodo Special  
  Biz/Finance
  BusinessFocus
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
  Community
  Special
  Science
  The Learning Times
     About English News
     iBT TOEFL
     Essay
     
 
   02-09-2010 19:38 여성 음성 남성 음성
Anti-US Beef Actress Prevails in Court


Actress Kim Min-sun was one of many entertainers who protested against the government’s decision to allow back U.S. beef into Korean markets.
By Park Si-soo
Staff Reporter

Actress Kim Min-sun won a legal battle Tuesday, started by an American beef importer for an article she wrote two years ago on her private blog that allegedly exaggerated the risk of mad cow disease associated with U.S. beef.

In May 2008, when the country was trapped in heated debate over the resumption of U.S. beef imports and its association with mad cow disease, the actress said in the article, "I would gulp a cup of potassium cyanide rather than eat a piece of American beef infected with the disease."

As the comment drew media attention, an American beef importer in Seoul, A-Meat, filed a suit against the actress and five staff members of an investigative TV journal, PD Notebook, for interrupting its business by spreading what it called "groundless" information about the imported beef. The importer also claimed its bottom line was hit hard by her defamatory article.

But the Seoul Southern District Court Tuesday ruled the actress and the TV program were not liable for any damages to the importer.

Judge Kim Sung-gon said in the ruling, "Her article revealed no specific information associated with the plaintiff. So it cannot be seen that her article interrupted its business." The judge also acquitted the five TV producers, saying the program was wholly based on data they compiled in the belief that they were all scientifically grounded.

"Also, the program was to criticize the government for a deal with Washington allegedly endorsed in a cursory manner, not a specific company," the judge said.

Two years have passed since the social unrest, provoked by the resumption of U.S. beef imports without thorough restrictions to keep risky parts of American beef at bay, ended.

To quell enraged citizens, who took to major streets for three months, President Lee Myung-bak solicited for the U.S. government to modify the terms of the contract signed between the two parties, made public apologies and reshuffled the Cabinet.

But society is still divided and shows no immediate sign of mending the rift. Rather, what is left over from the unrest is still plaguing the administration by providing a ground for ideological showdowns between those in favor of the conservative administration and its opponents, levying a heavy political burden on President Lee, who is in the midst of his five-year presidency.

The latest controversy, associated with the beef scandal two years ago, resurfaced after a court ruling early this month that exonerated the five TV producers from defamation charges.

On Jan. 20, the Seoul Central District Court cleared them on defamation charges for allegedly wrongly portraying the actions of two senior state trade negotiators during the Seoul-Washington talks to resume U.S. beef imports in 2008.

The ruling provoked immediate condemnation from conservative activists and politicians, pressuring the head of the judiciary to step down, calling the verdict a decision based on ideological bias. Some overzealous activists even staged rallies in front of the home of the judge in charge of the case, calling for his resignation.

Liberal activists and politicians condemned their moves, describing a series of acts by their counterparts as politically motivated moves to sway the judiciary, whose independent operation is guaranteed under the Constitution.

Galvanized by the ruling, the ruling Grand National Party is now pushing a package of bills to tighten its grip on the judiciary, while opposition parties are trying to strike down the attempt.

pss@koreatimes.co.kr





yistory@koreatimes.co.kr

법원 "의약품 '리베이트'는 과세 대상"

檢, 김효재 前수석 15일 오전 소환

경찰, 이태원 등 외국인 밀집지역 특별관리

한국에 대해 무엇이든 답변해 주는 블로거가 있다

"빌 클린턴, 르윈스키 첫만남부터 불꽃 튀어"

'대통령 찬양' 댓글 알바들 딱 걸렸다

"北 휴대전화 요금이 무려... 놀라운 변화"

SNS에 '김정은 암살설'… 근거없다

美 '팝의 여왕' 휘트니 휴스턴 사망


Reader's Comments
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
Managerial regulations
◀ Back ▲Top
 
 
[Exclusive] Renault Samsung to in..
Maintenance cost for F-15K soars..
Opposition’s rise in Busan alerts..
Medical Internship abolition plan..
Smart TV spat pits KT against Sam..
Hard time for judges: Would humbl..
N. Korean officials pledge allegi..
China gauging NK leader’s level o..
Obama negligent in embracing Kore..
NTS likely to order Samsung to pa..
(574) Realtor (IV)
Bullet From Behind
Two-Faced Romney