Nation
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw 음성듣기 설치 및 이용방법    Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Nation > Defense Affairs >
  Nation
    Photo News  
    Political Digest  
    Nation Digest  
    Provincial News  
    Defense Affairs  
    Airline News  
    Foreign Affairs / N.Korea  
    Seoul Air Show  
    Obituary  
    Dokdo Special  
    Ahn Jung-geun  
    Dokdo Essay Contest  
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
  Community
  Special
     
  The Learning Times
     Editorial Listening
     Phone English
     Dear Abby
     Domestic News
     Foreign News
     Screen English
     Live English in Drama
     Discovery Education  
     Ancient Idiom  
     iBT Writing  
     English Writing I
     English Writing II  
     English Grammar
     Grasping Vocab
     iBT Vocab
     Korean Language  
     
     Junior Writing
     Junior Reading
     Junior Reporter
     
 
   11-06-2009 18:04 여성 남성
8th US Army to Remain in Korea

By Jung Sung-ki
Staff Reporter

The Eighth U.S. Army (EUSA) will remain in South Korea even after Korean commanders take over wartime operational control (OPCON) of its forces from the U.S. military in 2012, the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) announced Friday.

The United States will inaugurate a new theater command ― Korea Command (KORCOM) ― but the date of establishment has not been set, it said in a press release.

The confirmation came after it was reported that KORCOM will be set up next June to replace the ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command (CFC) in line with the 2012 OPCON transition.

"As part of OPCON transition, the U.S. military will establish a new headquarters currently called Korea Command for planning purposes," the USFK said. "The date for the establishment of KORCOM has not been set. KORCOM will be a sub-unified command and have the same relationship to Pacific Command (in Hawaii) that USFK has now."

It said EUSA's transformation, to include planned moves to the Pyeongtaek area, "confirms the United States' commitment to a strong ROK-U.S. alliance and the defense of the Korean people."

Whether or not to relocate the EUSA headquarters in Seoul to other regions, such as Hawaii where the Pacific Command is located, has been controversial because of the command's symbolic status on the Korean Peninsula.

Established in 1944 in Memphis, Tenn., EUSA became the spearhead for the United Nations Command (UNC) to halt aggression by North Korea during the 1950-53 Korean War, and ultimately assumed overall responsibility for conducting ground operations on the peninsula under the command of a four-star American general.

But the army command's roles and missions have been significantly reduced since the establishment of the CFC, which takes charge of wartime operations on the peninsula, in 1978.

Since then, a three-star general has taken charge of EUSA, while the CFC has been headed by a four-star general, who concurrently serves as chief of the UNC and U.S. Forces Korea (USFK).

Currently, EUSA's missions are limited to administrative or personnel affairs. The 150-strong command is in charge of providing forces to the CFC commander and undertaking combat support operations, such as reception, staging, onward movement and integration missions, in the event of an emergency.

Earlier this year, CFC Commander Gen. Walter Sharp reportedly said he had suggested to his superiors at the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Command that the EUSA stay in South Korea even after the 2012 transition at the request of South Korean military leaders, who fear such a move would trigger a sense of insecurity among Korean citizens.

After several years of negotiations, Seoul and Washington agreed in 2007 that Seoul would execute independent operational control of its armed forces during wartime beginning April 17, 2012. The U.S. military would primarily provide naval and air support.

The two sides agreed to disband the CFC and run separate theater commands. A South Korean-U.S. "military cooperation center," a body for combat operations, will be set up to help facilitate joint operations.

The center will comprise about 10 standing and non-standing organizations.

But South Korean conservative groups regard the command changes as a U.S. move to reduce its security commitment to South Korea.

They argue the smaller role of the USFK amid lingering threats posed by Pyongyang could tip the military balance on the peninsula.

gallantjung@koreatimes.co.kr

Reader's Comments ▶ Other View
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
vnon   (72.253.70.129)   11-19-2009 10:20
VERNON BALMER JR. HONOLULU HAWAII 96820 On my IRS transcripts, there is a 1099 in my name for 2007. I never applied for social security, never received a check from social security, or cashed a check from social security. The SSA tells me there is no record of a 1099 in my name.July 16, 2009: My tax transcripts are stolen at the State Library. These included a set that was sent to me unsealed. There are discrepancies in my name, address, wages reported, and withholding.http://tiny.cc/xlkYX
noozzieskiwis   (99.27.108.59)   11-08-2009 06:30
USAF's response tells me that he'd rather have a pedophile go after his children. Sad & sickening. Like I said, vermin like him never learn.
IAMASINFULMAN   (211.183.87.49)   11-08-2009 04:40
2] As far as the American teachers that are here, they are here because many people want to learn English, Korean parents think it is important to their children future. We, every person assigns the value to a word or a group of words. So name calling does not affect me. I have been called many unkind names, and I am still alive. Sometimes these names accurately described me at that time in my life.
IAMASINFULMAN   (211.183.87.49)   11-08-2009 04:39
1] The US is doing the right thing by pulling their troops from Korea. It has become such a hot issue. I truly do not believe Korea needs the US troops here. If Korea is worried about he troop difference between the North and South, then they must put more men in uniform. Put the young men to work, this is where the highest unemployment rate is.
tuscan   (75.55.49.244)   11-08-2009 02:01
If the purpose is to remain in korea to protect korea from the chinese, japanese and russian imperialist pigs....long live to USA-Korean Alliance! but if the purpose is to attract anti korean rednecks who also are asiaphiles....no good.
▶ Managerial regulations
▶ Back ▲ Top