Nation
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw 음성듣기 설치 및 이용방법    Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Nation >
  Nation
    Photo News  
    Political Digest  
    Nation Digest  
    Provincial News  
    Defense Affairs  
    Airline News  
    Foreign Affairs / N.Korea  
    Seoul Air Show  
    Obituary  
    Dokdo Special  
    Ahn Jung-geun  
    Dokdo Essay Contest  
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
  Community
  Special
     
  The Learning Times
     Editorial Listening
     Phone English
     Dear Abby
     Domestic News
     Foreign News
     Screen English
     Live English in Drama
     Discovery Education  
     Ancient Idiom  
     iBT Writing  
     English Writing I
     English Writing II  
     English Grammar
     Grasping Vocab
     iBT Vocab
     Korean Language  
     
     Junior Writing
     Junior Reading
     Junior Reporter
     
 
   08-29-2009 21:35 여성 남성
Bosworth 'Still' Likely to Visit NK, Despite Denial

Despite the official denial from the U.S. State Department that negated the earlier South Korean media reports that a special envoy from Obama was scheduled to visit North Korea next month, an influential North Korean expert in the U.S. is confident that Bosworth will still head for the reclusive nation soon, RFA said Saturday.

Leon V. Sigal, director of the Northeast Asia Cooperative Security Project at the Social Science Research Council in New York, thinks Bosworth's imminent visit to the de facto the new nuclear power is inevitable.

"Of course, he'll go. How else we are going to fix the problem?" Sigal was quoted as saying in the report.

Sigal believes Bosworth's visit will be carried out sometime mid-September when U.S. officials have returned from their Labor Day holidays and when Japan also has a new Cabinet in place after its election on Sunday.

He suspects that Bosworth likely already finished discussing it with his South Korean counterpart when he visited Seoul last week when he was part of the U.S. delegation to pay tribute to the late South Korean President Kim Dae-jung.

Sigal's view differs from that of official U.S. state department, which said that Bosworth is scheduled to visit Asian nations soon, but also said that his itinerary doesn't include a visit to the communist nation.

Nonetheless, Sigal's statement is drawing keen attention. He previously accompanied Bosworth to Pyongyang in February and correctly predicted Bill Clinton's visit to Pyongyang thee months before Clinton actually went there. He is also believed to be "well connected" with the Obama administration.

As for the State Department's wording that said Bosworth had "no immediate plans to visit" North Korea, Sigal brushed it aside as a "minor" issue of expression, adding what it meant was Bosworth doesn't have plans to visit North Korea "not tomorrow, immediately."

Sigal also said that North Korea's earlier rejection of Bosworth's visit was due to the U.S. government's stipulation that North Korea stop missile launches, adding this time the U.S. shouldn't add any conditions for the visit.

Reader's Comments ▶ Other View
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
jimbo1a   (61.206.168.11)   08-30-2009 15:20
Barnsey, you cannot compare Cuba and NK. It is not the responsibility of the US to resolve the problems with NK, it should be done by SK. However, SK has failed to rise to the challenge. The US has been more than fair with NK, allowing light water reactors, sending aid, rescuing their ships, etc. Can you tell me one thing NK has done to show it can play nice in the sandbox? With NK, everything is one way.
barnsey   (121.163.53.209)   08-30-2009 12:50
EZ ~ the worst part of this NK standoff has always been characterized by a U.S. reluctance to take the bull by the horns and face down its adversary. Resorting to arms-length, veiled threats, UN sanctions and isolationism was never the right response. Any more so than it it had been with Cuba.
barnsey   (121.163.53.209)   08-30-2009 12:47
Jewland? You must be talking about Israel... Are u suggesting that a nuclear armed NK is a good thing for South Korea?
ezlife   (75.162.121.77)   08-30-2009 12:26
Who cares??
barnsey   (121.163.53.209)   08-30-2009 11:12
BTW zbd ~ Bosworth is a former US/SK embassador.
▶ Managerial regulations
▶ Back ▲ Top