Nation
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw 음성듣기 설치 및 이용방법    Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Nation > Nation Digest >
  Nation
    Photo News  
    Political Digest  
    Nation Digest  
    Provincial News  
    Defense Affairs  
    Airline News  
    Foreign Affairs / N.Korea  
    Seoul Air Show  
    Obituary  
    Dokdo Special  
    Ahn Jung-geun  
    Dokdo Essay Contest  
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
  Community
  Special
     
  The Learning Times
     Editorial Listening
     Phone English
     Dear Abby
     Domestic News
     Foreign News
     Screen English
     Live English in Drama
     Discovery Education  
     Ancient Idiom  
     iBT Writing  
     English Writing I
     English Writing II  
     English Grammar
     Grasping Vocab
     iBT Vocab
     Korean Language  
     
     Junior Writing
     Junior Reading
     Junior Reporter
     
 
   06-18-2009 18:16 여성 남성
MBC Staffers Indicted Over Mad Cow Report

By Kim Rahn
Staff Reporter

Prosecutors indicted four MBC program directors and a scriptwriter of a current affairs program, Thursday, for distorting facts with the intention to exaggerate the risk of mad cow disease associated with American beef.

The five, working on for PD Notebook, were indicted without physical detention on charges of defamation and interference with business.

They responded by saying the indictment was a serious infringement of freedom of the press.

The indictment came a year after the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries asked the prosecution to investigate the program for defamation on June 20. The program about U.S. beef and the risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease, was aired on April 29. The program was crucial in triggering the months-long candlelit vigil against a decision to import American beef.

``In 30 scenes, the program directors intentionally distorted facts about the disease and the government's negotiations with the U.S. and thus spread false information, defaming former Agriculture Minister Chung Woon-chun and Min Dong-seok, the former chief negotiator of the beef deal,'' senior prosecutor Jeong Byeong-doo said.

According to the prosecution, the producers made false reports through arbitrary misinterpretation of interviews in English or omitting translations; distorting facts; omitting explanations; and connecting scenes without causal relationship together so that they looked like they were related.

``The distorted editing made viewers, who had had little information about the issue, believe that the government negotiated poorly with the U.S. and that American beef carrying a high risk of BSE contamination would be imported,'' Jeong said.

``It seriously damaged Chung and Min as they had to suffer from threats and insults such as being called `traitors' on the Internet,'' he said.

The program also harmed the business of American beef importers, who suffered from losses in sales and difficulty in forging business ties, Jeong said.

Fierce Legal Battle Ahead

The producers, however, claim the report was not false, even though they admitted to some mistakes in translation. They denounced the prosecution for ``suppressing the freedom of expression, which is a basic principle of democracy.''

``It is a comedy that the government accuses journalists for criticizing a wrong policy and sues them for defamation. I don't know what `intention' we had. We never mentioned the names of Chung and Min in the program,'' Cho Neung-hee, one of the producers, said.

Following the indictment and refutation, a fierce legal battle is expected over whether the alleged distortions and exaggerations were intentional, or were caused from mistakes in sorting out and editing material.

The court must decide whether a critical report about public policy can discredit public officials, and whether the program and beef importers' losses were directly related.

In a related trial, the Seoul High Court ordered MBC, Wednesday, to air a correction about certain content of the program, accepting the ministry's request. The broadcaster will not need to follow the order until the Supreme Court makes a final ruling.

rahnita@koreatimes.co.kr

Reader's Comments ▶ Other View
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
biteme   (218.38.48.151)   06-20-2009 20:44
mwhitaker-same old tired refrain. Rather than read your science fiction, I'll wait for the movie to come out---it will take less time.
mwhitaker   (203.255.190.41)   06-19-2009 23:27
'Partial statistics more sound' than testing/tracking every cow is wrong. "The only sure way to know the age of a beef animal [for current regulation by age] is to have a birth certificate for each and every single animal. Since beef production in the United States means large herds spread over wide geographic areas, THAT [profit-draining, consumer desired testing] IS NOT [DONE]."--Dr. J.B. Penn, 2004, Under-Sec. of Agriculture for farm and foreign agricultural services [same link]
mwhitaker   (203.255.190.41)   06-19-2009 23:26
How many of you US-ians trust government with your health? You must be part of that tiny 7% of U.S. citizens mentioned in poll oblivious to endless health scares all the time in U.S. food.
mwhitaker   (203.255.190.41)   06-19-2009 23:25
The answer to another question re-given. U.S. USDA does 'double test' on mad cow. When it finds it, retest done. All retests always been publicized as 'negative'. However, they don't do retests of potential for false first negatives, so they trust a negative first result. If the test is really questionable, why trust original negative result--of a laughable .01% testing!? The second test seems just a form of cover up when they actually do their job and find mad cow.
mwhitaker   (203.255.190.41)   06-19-2009 23:20
However, for scant few of neurological autopsies done, some were CJD in USA--though doctors assumed falsely it was Alzheimer's.
▶ Managerial regulations
▶ Back ▲ Top