Nation
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw 음성듣기 설치 및 이용방법    Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Nation > Political Digest >
  Nation
    Photo News  
    Political Digest  
    Nation Digest  
    Provincial News  
    Defense Affairs  
    Airline News  
    Foreign Affairs / N.Korea  
    Seoul Air Show  
    Obituary  
    Dokdo Special  
    Ahn Jung-geun  
    Dokdo Essay Contest  
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
  Community
  Special
     
  The Learning Times
     Editorial Listening
     Phone English
     Dear Abby
     Domestic News
     Foreign News
     Screen English
     Live English in Drama
     Discovery Education  
     Ancient Idiom  
     iBT Writing  
     English Writing I
     English Writing II  
     English Grammar
     Grasping Vocab
     iBT Vocab
     Korean Language  
     
     Junior Writing
     Junior Reading
     Junior Reporter
     
 
   03-27-2009 18:32 여성 남성
Foreign Teacher Renews Visa With No Health Checks

By Kang Shin-who
Staff Reporter

The Korea Immigration Service (KIS) allegedly extended an E-2 visa to an American teacher who refused to submit mandatory health checks.

Andrea Vandom, an English instructor at Chung-Ang University, visited the Suwon Immigration Office, Wednesday, to renew her status under the terms of the English-teaching visa rules.

But Vandom told The Korea Times that she had her visa extended ― even though she refused to submit papers on health checks, which are demanded under the regulations that govern the E2 visa. She only handed over criminal record documents to the authorities, she said.

This case appears to suggest that the immigration rules are being bent ― not applicable to those who complain strongly, she said.

Instead of producing documents showing HIV/AIDS and drug test results, she gave an immigration officer a letter.

It reads: ``Unfortunately, I will not be submitting the HIV/ AIDS test results or the tuberculosis drug test results that you have requested. These tests unreasonably discriminate against me as a foreigner living in Korea and are a violation of my human rights.''

In the letter, she also said that she has lived and worked in Korea for more than three years and does not understand why she is suddenly suspected of being a danger to Korean society.

``I have done nothing wrong, and yet the Korea Immigration Service wants to search my body. This is an invasion of my most private and personal rights and an affront to my human dignity,'' she said.

According to Vandom, after reading the letter, the immigration official showed the letter to one of his colleagues, and then his colleague came back and said, ``Last year, the law changed and you need HIV and drug tests.''

Vandom, 30, said she then replied, ``I understand what you are saying,'' and again directed his attention to the letter. At this point, she said, the immigration officer completed the sojourn application form and handed over her alien registration card saying ``visa extension, one year.''

``I feel relieved that my human rights were respected. However, I feel concerned about thousands of other E-2 visa holders living and working in Korea that have not been similarly treated,'' Vandom said.

The case is expected to ignite further dispute among a group of foreign English teachers who are campaigning against the controversial immigration regulations.

The alleged presence of selective enforcement is likely to provide a spur for the group's lobbying activities.

``If they had rejected Vandom, we planned to take legal action against the regulations, which have no legal grounds. But they just gave her a visa. We will continually support foreign teachers challenging the discriminative immigration rules,'' said Chang Suh-yeon, an attorney working for the Korean Public Interest Lawyers' Group, Gong-Gam.

But the KIS refuted the allegations. Kim Young-keun, a KIS spokesperson, said the immigration office in Suwon had received all of the necessary documents to allow the organization to grant a renewal. ``It is impossible for us to grant a visa in violation of the regulations,'' he said.

But Vandom claimed the KIS denial is a fabrication. ``It is shocking that the immigration office is lying about this. Why would I give them that letter if I were submitting the HIV/AIDS and drug tests?'' she said.

A group of foreign teachers, including the Association for Teachers of English in Korea (ATEK), have criticized AIDS and drug check-up rules, which have been imposed since December 2007.
According to KIS, some 21,000 foreigners held an E-2 visa as of February.

kswho@koreatimes.co.kr

Reader's Comments ▶ Other View
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
Busanoid   (59.28.201.35)   04-01-2009 14:15
Do not many American companies require drug tests of their employees? Where does she come off claiming this is a violation of her human rights? And if her employer is providing her with health insurance as well, it seems to me that her employer would have a right to know about preexisting health condtions, like HIV infection or TB. IMO, she's being totally unreasonable, or she's hiding something.
ItalianCanuck1   (124.137.21.207)   03-30-2009 10:07
If you really want or need the job, then you have to make a choice about whether you take the job I guess. Some schools do pay (or reimburse later), such as Pagoda (and I think YBM)....most may not though.
zeth06   (69.235.148.51)   03-30-2009 06:09
Hagwons are a business and I would THINK that most businesses would realize that it's in in their interest to attract the best and the brightest. Forcing potential applicants to bear a cost that would likely discourage many doesn't seem prudent.
ItalianCanuck1   (121.170.146.245)   03-30-2009 00:17
I hear you about the costs of criminal check, though, zeth...only cost me like 30 bucks I think when I was back in Canada.....still, when you apply for a country in your home country, nobody expects the employer to pay for costs related to getting a job, whether it is cost of transportation to and from job you are applying to, or any checks required then.
ItalianCanuck1   (121.170.146.245)   03-30-2009 00:14
Yeap, she made a point, alright, jimbo. "I'm a whiny bitch." Look, you knew would have to do this health check last year, right? The fact you came to the office with a letter already suggests you were not surprised to be asked for your health check, right?
▶ Managerial regulations
▶ Back ▲ Top