Nation
 
    
  
+Login    +Register    +Find Id / Pw 음성듣기 설치 및 이용방법    Home  l  Archives  l  Learning Times  |  Sitemap  |  Subscription  l  Media Kit  l  PDF
   Home > Newszone > Nation > Nation Digest >
  Nation
    Photo News  
    Political Digest  
    Nation Digest  
    Provincial News  
    Defense Affairs  
    Airline News  
    Foreign Affairs / N.Korea  
    Seoul Air Show  
    Obituary  
    Dokdo Special  
    Ahn Jung-geun  
    Dokdo Essay Contest  
  Biz/Finance
  Technology
  Arts & Living
  Sports
  Opinion
  Community
  Special
     
  The Learning Times
     Editorial Listening
     Phone English
     Dear Abby
     Domestic News
     Foreign News
     Screen English
     Live English in Drama
     Discovery Education  
     Ancient Idiom  
     iBT Writing  
     English Writing I
     English Writing II  
     English Grammar
     Grasping Vocab
     iBT Vocab
     Korean Language  
     
     Junior Writing
     Junior Reading
     Junior Reporter
     
 
   02-18-2009 20:36 여성 남성
Court Acknowledges Rape of Transsexual

By Park Si-soo
Staff Reporter

A provincial court for the first time found a man in his 20s guilty of ``raping'' a transexual, Wednesday, challenging the current law that defines rape to when a man has forcible sex with a woman born a female. The victim's legal gender still remains man.

The Busan District Court sentenced the man to three years in prison suspended for four years on charges of raping the 59-year-old transsexual. He was also ordered to participate in 120 hours of community service.

Judge Ko Jong-joo said in the ruling, ``The victim has acted like woman since he was born. In 1974, when he turned 24, he underwent a gender reassignment program. He once also lived with a male partner for a decade. Given all of these, he can be seen as female.''

The judge added that although the victim was legally a man, but this did not take into account his sexual identity. ``Thus, his sex in legal documents cannot be seen as his `ultimate' gender,'' he said.

The rapist invaded the victim's home last August and raped her using a blunt weapon. The prosecution initially indicted the man on a ``molestation'' charge but changed it to ``rape'' later after considering the victim's personal history. It sought a five-year prison term, Feb. 11.

Giving the unprecedented ruling, the judge set three criteria to define the precedent ― whether the victim had sex change surgery; how long he/she has lived with appearance of the opposite sex; and if he/she has no problems having sexual relations.

In a similar case in 1996, the Supreme Court did not acknowledge rape charge, citing the victim's sexual chromosome identity as a male.

pss@koreatimes.co.kr

Reader's Comments ▶ Other View
Notice From KT Website Manager
Bad language will not be tolerated. All comments considered discriminatory against race or sex, or which are considered offensive against certain people, will be eliminated by the manager. Violators will be deprived of their membership.
Please stay on topic.
pastor2   (211.206.16.166)   02-19-2009 15:34
Jimbo; You shouldn't pick on archibabel so much.. especially when i'm drinking coffee... i almost choked..to death.
pastor2   (211.206.16.166)   02-19-2009 15:26
I agree totally with Italian.. forcing sex upon a man, woman, child, or even a goat should be considered rape.. and should be punishable as a crime.
Scarmentado99   (121.168.55.162)   02-19-2009 15:26
So what he's basically saying is, "Yes, your honor, I broke into her house, hit her over the head with a blunt instrument, and raped her, but it's ok because I don't think she's really a woman." They're probably going to start teaching this case in law school now.
jimbo1a   (59.20.215.151)   02-18-2009 22:46
God, raping a 59 year old man/woman. How sick. The only thing sicker is the judges sentence. But seriously, Arse, I hope you're OK. You should probably get some consouling, and also get one of those doughnuts to sit on until you heal.
ItalianCanuck1   (121.170.146.245)   02-18-2009 21:50
Rape is rape--gender, even mixed-one, is not relevant!
▶ Managerial regulations
▶ Back ▲ Top