The Korea Times close
National
  • Politics
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Multicultural Community
  • Defense
  • Environment & Animals
  • Law & Crime
  • Society
  • Health & Science
Business
  • Tech
  • Bio
  • Companies
Finance
  • Companies
  • Economy
  • Markets
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to President
  • Letter to the Editor
Lifestyle
  • Travel & Food
  • Trends
  • People & Events
  • Books
  • Around Town
  • Fortune Telling
Entertainment
& Arts
  • K-pop
  • Films
  • Shows & Dramas
  • Music
  • Theater & Others
Sports
World
  • SCMP
  • Asia
Video
  • Culture
  • People
  • News
Photos
  • Photo News
  • Darkroom
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
National
  • Politics
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Multicultural Community
  • Defense
  • Environment & Animals
  • Law & Crime
  • Society
  • Health & Science
Sat, May 21, 2022 | 12:21
Google’s new policy rekindles privacy debate
구글 개인정보 통합, 다시 붉어진 프라이버시 논쟁
Posted : 2012-03-04 15:06
Updated : 2012-03-04 15:06
Print Preview
Font Size Up
Font Size Down


By Kang Ye-won

Despite the global backlash and government scrutiny, Google’s new privacy policy took effect March 1, which consolidated users’ private information stored across 60 of its services to create one profile. In other words, Google will have a better access to user data collected from Gmail and Google search to YouTube and calendar to come up with more sophisticated targeted advertising.

For instance, it can alert users when they’re late for a meeting based on their location, calendar and local traffic condition. The new policy does not apply to Chrome and Google Wallet.

“We’re not just keeping your private stuff private but making it more useful to you in your daily life, too,” says a Google’s official YouTube posting about the new policy.

But the media fretted over the online giant to becoming like Big Brother and the U.S. and European regulators warned that the new policy violates their data protection laws.

Korea Communications Commission (KCC), too, officially stated last week that Google violated the nation’s online privacy rule, which requires users’ consent before giving their personal information and to provide certain information in specific terms including how the company uses data, how long the data is stored, how users can erase it, and the contact information in case they want to file complaints of privacy breach.

“We considered the new policy is vague and difficult to understand,” said Kim Kwang-su, a director of KCC’s privacy policy division. And Google doesn’t give an option of opting out, which is against the guidelines, Kim added.

What privacy?

Google has been collecting data through its 70-something services by picking up cookies, server log information and location data, and some experts say that with the new policy, technically users will notice no difference.

The way the search titan will handle the data is no more radical than how they have gathered them before, but it’s a matter of how the users perceive it, said Kim Jae-yeon, an author of “Being Social Web.”

“What Google is missing every time (it faces a backlash) is that it’s not about what’s really changed but what the users think is changed,” Kim said.

Back in 2010, Google’s first social networking tool, Google Buzz backfired when it automatically set up the list of followers based on the users’ records from their Gmail and Gchat and made it public by default. The search giant shut down the service and settled with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to submit to regular audits for the next 20 years.

“Asking for a complete privacy right in the era of ubiquitous online services, which constantly push for openness and sharing data, is like asking a driver to slow down to 10 kph in the 60 kph zone,” Kim said.

In fact, some users welcome the Google’s effort to provide more tailored services based on the collated data.

“I have no problem with Google’s privacy policy change,” said Stafford Lumsden, a technology columnist for 10 Magazine in Korea.
“It's economics, they provide cool services for free, they have to pay for it somehow, … , if they have to sell a few advertisements, so be it,” Lumsden said.

“In the era of ubiquitous and big data, it is inevitable for online users to release their basic personal information,” said Kang Hak-ju, manager at eStory Lab, a social media strategy firm. “It’s important for users to be mindful about the service they use and they give information about themselves in return,” Kang said.

For instance, many people have signed up for Kakao Talk, a smartphone messenger app, to take advantage of its free texting service, but not a lot of them are aware of the condition which they allow the service provider to have a full access to their phone book. And when the company comes up with a possible list of friends based on the given data, people jitter, he said.

“More privacy glitches will come down the road, so it’s up to individual user who should give more thoughts to a meaning of privacy and form their own ethical guidelines,” Kang said.

In response to the trend, scholars have debated about the meaning of privacy in the 21st century.

“Making something that is public more public is a violation of privacy,” said danah boyd, a senior researcher at Microsoft Research and social media scholar, when speaking at the South by Southwest Music Conference and Festival (SXSW) in 2010.

“What’s at stake here is often not about whether or not something is public or private, but how public or private it is.”

Double standard

Experts say Google is not the first one who has aggregated personal data. Korean conglomerates including Samsung Group, CJ Group, and KT have done what’s called a single sign-on or SSO, which is to unify private log-in information across their services, to make it easier to manage data and save costs as well.

And critics argue that the Korean government has brought a double standard to foreign and national companies when it comes to protecting online privacy.

“I personally don’t understand why the KCC (Korea Communications Commission) probes only Google on the privacy breach matter while leaving out other Korean companies who’ve taken similar actions,” Kang said. And the government pressed its stringent Internet policies at the expense of the users’ convenience.

For instance, the government’s push for a ‘real name’ policy on YouTube back in 2009 was not done to protect the users’ rights, but rather to exert its authority over a global titan, he said.

In consequence, YouTube restricted its video upload and comment function in Korea in order to avoid the user identification requirement.

At the same time, people agreed that Internet giants such as Google and Facebook have consistently pushed a step at a time with privacy setting to get users numbed to it.

“Google’s defense claiming that it gave users options to control their privacy is not convincing enough, because most users don’t follow the privacy setting up to date and feel no obligation to do so for the matter of convenience and cost,” said Kim, the author of “Being Social Web.”

Checklist for Google users

Check the Dashboard

Go to google.com/dashboard and log in with your email address. Dashboard provides an overview of your account across the services from Google+ to Books to Picasa Web Albums to Voice. Take a few minutes to see which services you have given your information and clear out the data you don’t want to share.

Clear your Google Web History

History keeps track of your Web browsing records including pages you visit and search on Google. It also collects additional information such as your Internet Protocol address, browser type and language, according to the site. You can erase your traces on google.com/history. Even when you’re logged out of your account, Google can track your search history from a browser cookie.

Disable personalized ads

By default, Google serves personalized ads based on your search queries and Gmail content. You can selectively block advertisers or opt out of the service.

Google Takeout

It lets you download a copy of your data from the services you shared them. After downloading the archive, you can pick and choose which data from the individual services to delete.

Delete your Google account

The ultimate option is to remove your Google account completely. It means losing all of the information you stored in Google services. Go to google.com/settings, under Services click Delete entire Google account.

To learn more about how Google collects and uses personal data with its new policy, visit google.com/policies.

구글 개인정보 통합, 다시 붉어진 프라이버시 논쟁
구글의 새로운 개인정보 통합정책은 60여개가 넘는 구글 서비스를 하나로 합치는 것으로, 최근 전세계적으로 프라이버시에 대한 논쟁을 다시 일으켰지만, 계획대로 3월1일부터 시작했다. 다시 말해, 구글은 이제 사용자의 지메일과 구글서치기록 부터 켈린더와 유투브등의 사용 데이터를 한곳에 저장하여 좀 더 지능적인 광고를 만드는데 도움이 될 것이라는 지적이다. 예를들어, 구글은 사용자의 위치추적과 켈린더, 주변 교통상활 등의 정보를 파악하여, 당신이 미팅에 늦었다고 알려줄 수 있다. 한국 방송통신위원회는 지난 주 구글 정책이 국내 개인정보보호법에 어긋나는지 조사를 하겠다고 발표했다. '21세기 프라이버시' 세계적으로 가장 큰 서치엔진의 구글은 70여개의 서비스를 통해 사용자의 쿠키, 서버로그 정보, 위치추적 데이터 등을 통하여 개인정보를 수집해왔다. 이번 정책이 데이터를 수집하는 방법에서 예전보다 달라질 것은 없다는 전문가 의견도 있다. 그러나 온라인 프라이버시 이슈에 있어서, 사람들이 어떻게 인식하는것이 더 중요하다는 입장도 있다. "유비쿼터스 시대, 혹은 빅데이터 시대에 개인이 기본적인 정보를 노출하는 것은 피할 수 없는 현실입니다," 이스토리랩의 강학주 소장은 말한다. "우리가 더 고민해야할 문제는 (온라인 프라이버시에 대한) 개개인의 인식이 부족한데, 스스로 윤리적 가이드를 만들어야 합니다." 21세기 프라이버시의 논쟁은 더이상 공공정보와 개인정보 개념의 문제가 아니라, 얼마나 공공적이고 개인적인지의 문제라고, danah boyd 라는 소셜미디어 연구가가 2010 SXSW 에서 말한 적이 있다.
Emailyewonkang@koreatimes.co.kr Article ListMore articles by this reporter
 
  • Pro-, anti-Biden demonstrations to be held in front of Hyatt hotel
  • S-Oil CEO apologizes for deadly refinery explosion in Ulsan
  • Biden arrives in South Korea for first summit with Yoon
  • South Korea-Japan relations in the shadow of Ukraine
  • Yoon, Biden vow to strengthen Korea-US tech alliance
  • Samsung, LG expand into appliances with pet care features
  • Gov't extends mandatory quarantine for COVID-19 patients for 4 more weeks
  • Baseball, dogs: What Yoon, Biden have in common
  • Yoon, Biden to discuss Korea-US tech alliance in nuclear energy
  • South Korea's new COVID-19 cases drop for 3rd day
  • Kim Sae-ron apologizes for her alleged DUI incident Kim Sae-ron apologizes for her alleged DUI incident
  • Reality shows raise concerns by zooming in on private lives of people Reality shows raise concerns by zooming in on private lives of people
  • TvN drama 'Rose Mansion' criticized for animal abuse scene TvN drama 'Rose Mansion' criticized for animal abuse scene
  • Former GFriend member Yerin makes solo debut with 'Aria' Former GFriend member Yerin makes solo debut with 'Aria'
  • 'The Roundup' off to record-setting start at box office 'The Roundup' off to record-setting start at box office
DARKROOM
  • People in North Korea trapped in famine and pandemic

    People in North Korea trapped in famine and pandemic

  • 2022 Pulitzer Prize: Bearing witness to history

    2022 Pulitzer Prize: Bearing witness to history

  • Worsening drought puts millions at risk

    Worsening drought puts millions at risk

  • Our children deserve the best

    Our children deserve the best

  • End of mask mandates

    End of mask mandates

The Korea Times
CEO & Publisher : Oh Young-jin
Digital News Email : webmaster@koreatimes.co.kr
Tel : 02-724-2114
Online newspaper registration No : 서울,아52844
Date of registration : 2020.02.05
Masthead : The Korea Times
Copyright © koreatimes.co.kr. All rights reserved.
  • About Us
  • Introduction
  • History
  • Location
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
  • Products & Service
  • Subscribe
  • E-paper
  • Mobile Service
  • RSS Service
  • Content Sales
  • Policy
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Service
  • 고충처리인
  • Youth Protection Policy
  • Code of Ethics
  • Copyright Policy
  • Family Site
  • Hankook Ilbo
  • Dongwha Group