The Korea Times close
National
  • Politics
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Multicultural Community
  • Defense
  • Environment & Animals
  • Law & Crime
  • Society
  • Health & Science
Business
  • Tech
  • Bio
  • Companies
Finance
  • Companies
  • Economy
  • Markets
Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Columns
  • Thoughts of the Times
  • Cartoon
  • Today in History
  • Blogs
  • Tribune Service
  • Blondie & Garfield
  • Letter to President
  • Letter to the Editor
Lifestyle
  • Travel & Food
  • Trends
  • People & Events
  • Books
  • Around Town
  • Fortune Telling
Entertainment
& Arts
  • K-pop
  • Films
  • Shows & Dramas
  • Music
  • Theater & Others
Sports
World
  • SCMP
  • Asia
Video
  • Culture
  • People
  • News
Photos
  • Photo News
  • Darkroom
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
  • The Korea Times
  • search
  • Site Map
  • E-paper
  • Subscribe
  • Register
  • LogIn
search close
National
  • Politics
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Multicultural Community
  • Defense
  • Environment & Animals
  • Law & Crime
  • Society
  • Health & Science
Fri, May 20, 2022 | 09:12
Defense
ROK-US disagree on exercises; OPCON transition may be delayed
Posted : 2020-05-31 15:45
Updated : 2020-06-01 18:18
Print Preview
Font Size Up
Font Size Down
Defense Minister Jeong Kyeong-doo, right, and U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper hold a press conference at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., in this February photo. / Korea Times file
Defense Minister Jeong Kyeong-doo, right, and U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper hold a press conference at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., in this February photo. / Korea Times file

By Kang Seung-woo

South Korea and the United States are yet to reach agreement over how to execute planned joint military exercises in August, according to sources, Sunday, raising speculation that the disagreement may expand to pushing back the transfer of operational control (OPCON) of South Korean troops during wartime from Washington to Seoul.

Hoping that it will regain OPCON by 2022, South Korea wants the upcoming exercises to be focused on assessing its relevant capabilities, but the U.S. is stressing that they need to focus on maintaining the joint military posture that may have been undermined following the postponement of annual drills in the first half of the year due to the COVID-19 outbreak.

The OPCON transition calls on a South Korean general to command the Combined Forces Command (CFC), with a U.S. general taking a supportive role. Currently, the CFC is headed by the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) commander who also leads the United Nations Command (UNC).

In February, the allies decided to indefinitely delay their annual joint military exercises amid a surge in COVID-19 cases across the Korean Peninsula, so the U.S. military believes that the upcoming exercises in August should serve as grounds to prove their combat readiness rather than preparing for the OPCON transfer, according to the sources.

However, the defense ministry here is underscoring that they should test Full Operational Capability (FOC), in which a South Korean commander will take responsibility for the combined defense posture. The FOC is the second of the three-phase verification process for OPCON transfer and if it gets approved by the defense ministers of both sides, a Full Mission Capability (FMC) test will be carried out next year. The two sides carried out an initial operational capability (IOC) test in August last year.

"Should the FOC verification be delayed, the timeframe for the OPCON transfer could be put on hold," a source said.

South Korea, which regained peacetime OPCON in 1994, was supposed to retake the wartime authority by the end of 2015, but the plan was delayed in 2014 after the allies agreed to seek a "conditions-based" transition due to growing tensions on the peninsula.

Those conditions include the acquisition of necessary military capabilities for a South Korea-led combined defense, the securing of critical military response capabilities by the South to deal with North Korea's nuclear and missile threats, and the security environment on the Korean Peninsula and in the region.

"Since the middle of last year, the U.S. military, led by CFC Commander Gen. Robert Abrams, has voiced negative opinions on the OPCON transfer. What Gen. Abrams and the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff stress is that the transition should be based on three conditions, but they complain that the South Korean government is in a hurry to meet its own timetable," said Park Won-gon, a professor of international politics at Handong Global University. The Moon Jae-in administration is seeking to complete the transfer before its term ends in 2022.

The difference on how to program the joint military exercises also comes after the government recently became at odds with the UNC over the latter's role in inter-Korean affairs.

The UNC announced the findings of its investigation into a recent gunfire exchange between South and North Korean soldiers across the border, and its results were in stark contrast to the Ministry of National Defense's conclusion. The ministry expressed regret over the announcement immediately, citing the UNC's failure to properly investigate the North's actions.

Some observers in military circles believe that the UNC was seeking to maintain its presence on the peninsula through the incident.

"After the OPCON transition, the U.S. will assume a supporting role on the peninsula," Park said.

"Considering such a situation, the U.S. is seemingly seeking to exert influence here through the UNC. In addition, I think that the U.S. also has a plan to use the UNC as a replacement for the South Korea-led CFC ― although the U.S. government has denied this speculation."


Emailksw@koreatimes.co.kr Article ListMore articles by this reporter
 
  • People in North Korea trapped in famine and pandemic [PHOTOS]
  • Korea to resume issuing short-term travel visas, e-visas next month
  • Why doctors oppose Nursing Act legislation
  • KBO commissioner proposes holding season openers, regular games in US in meeting with MLB official
  • Luna fiasco escalates into class action by victims
  • Consumers alarmed by high sodium, saturated fat in meal-kits
  • Black Eagles seek to show ROK Air Force's prowess in England
  • Huge fire erupts at S-Oil's Ulsan factory
  • US denial of Biden-Moon meeting triggers speculation
  • Small Seoul temple becomes beacon for religious harmony
  • PSY's first boy group TNX makes much-anticipated debut with EP 'Way Up' PSY's first boy group TNX makes much-anticipated debut with EP 'Way Up'
  • MBC's 'Tomorrow' denies intentional use of BTS members' name, birthdates MBC's 'Tomorrow' denies intentional use of BTS members' name, birthdates
  • [INTERVIEW] Son Suk-ku portrays different villain in 'The Roundup' [INTERVIEW] Son Suk-ku portrays different villain in 'The Roundup'
  • Sequels to hit Korean films await theatrical release this year Sequels to hit Korean films await theatrical release this year
  • Kim Sae-ron apologizes for her alleged DUI incident Kim Sae-ron apologizes for her alleged DUI incident
DARKROOM
  • People in North Korea trapped in famine and pandemic [PHOTOS]

    People in North Korea trapped in famine and pandemic [PHOTOS]

  • 2022 Pulitzer Prize: Bearing witness to history

    2022 Pulitzer Prize: Bearing witness to history

  • Worsening drought puts millions at risk

    Worsening drought puts millions at risk

  • Our children deserve the best

    Our children deserve the best

  • End of mask mandates

    End of mask mandates

The Korea Times
CEO & Publisher : Oh Young-jin
Digital News Email : webmaster@koreatimes.co.kr
Tel : 02-724-2114
Online newspaper registration No : 서울,아52844
Date of registration : 2020.02.05
Masthead : The Korea Times
Copyright © koreatimes.co.kr. All rights reserved.
  • About Us
  • Introduction
  • History
  • Location
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
  • Products & Service
  • Subscribe
  • E-paper
  • Mobile Service
  • RSS Service
  • Content Sales
  • Policy
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Service
  • 고충처리인
  • Youth Protection Policy
  • Code of Ethics
  • Copyright Policy
  • Family Site
  • Hankook Ilbo
  • Dongwha Group